(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)
Navigation

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-8 Issue-83 October-2021
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Performance evaluation of compressed laterite blocks stabilised with cement and gum Arabic
Author Name : Alladjo Rimbarngaye, John N. Mwero and Erick K. Ronoh
Abstract :

Compressed stabilized earth blocks are the innovation of building materials replacing the earth blocks commonly called adobe. However, the use of cement or lime to stabilize these blocks is a major problem for the environment because of the emission of greenhouse gases and these materials are not accessible to everyone due to their cost. Finding a natural, environmentally friendly alternative, such as renewable materials and especially biopolymers or natural binders, to these types of stabilization materials is vital. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the effects of Gum Arabic (GA) as binder on the structural performance of laterite blocks. Compressed laterite blocks were stabilized with 2% of cement (C) and various percentages of GA, from 0 to 10%. The results showed that GA improved the water absorption, dry density and compressive strength of the blocks and the best results were obtained for blocks with (2%C+8%GA). For instance, the compressive strength at 28 days was increased by 27.81% compared to the control blocks with 2% cement. Based on the findings from this study, GA can be recommended as a binder in making laterite blocks in a sustainable way.

Keywords : Gum Arabic, Compressed stabilised laterite blocks, Water absorption, Dry density, Compressive strength.
Cite this article : Rimbarngaye A, Mwero JN, Ronoh EK. Performance evaluation of compressed laterite blocks stabilised with cement and gum Arabic. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021; 8(83):1268-1278. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2021.874536.
References :
[1]Kasinikota P, Tripura DD. Evaluation of compressed stabilized earth block properties using crushed brick waste. Construction and Building Materials. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[2]Reddy BV, Mani M, Walker P. Earthen dwellings and structures: current status in their adoption. Springer; 2019.
[Google Scholar]
[3]Miccoli L, Müller U, Fontana P. Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: a comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob. Construction and Building Materials. 2014; 61:327-39.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Danso H, Martinson B, Ali M, Mant C. Performance characteristics of enhanced soil blocks: a quantitative review. Building Research & Information. 2015; 43(2):253-62.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]Sharma V, Marwaha BM, Vinayak HK. Enhancing durability of adobe by natural reinforcement for propagating sustainable mud housing. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 2016; 5(1):141-55.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Medvey B, Dobszay G. Durability of stabilized earthen constructions: a review. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 2020; 38(3):2403-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]Jang J. A review of the application of biopolymers on geotechnical engineering and the strengthening mechanisms between typical biopolymers and soils. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Patel AJ, Patel VM, Patel MA. Review on partial replacement of cement in concrete. In UKIERI concrete congress–concrete research driving profit and sustainability 2015 (pp. 831-7).
[Google Scholar]
[9]Chang I, Lee M, Tran AT, Lee S, Kwon YM, Im J, et al. Review on biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) technology in geotechnical engineering practices. Transportation Geotechnics. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Losini AE, Grillet AC, Bellotto M, Woloszyn M, Dotelli G. Natural additives and biopolymers for raw earth construction stabilization–a review. Construction and Building Materials. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Dabou B, Kanali C, Abiero-Gariy Z. Structural performance of laterite soil stabilised with cement and blue gum (Eucalyptus Globulus) wood ash for use as a road base material. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology. 2021; 69(9):257-264.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[12]Riza FV, Rahman IA, Zaidi AM. A brief review of compressed stabilized earth brick (CSEB). In international conference on science and social research 2010 (pp. 999-1004). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Peng C. Calculation of a buildings life cycle carbon emissions based on ecotect and building information modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016; 112:453-65.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Hoff EC. Appraisal of the sustainability of compressed stabilized earthen masonry. Dissertations and Student Research, University of Nebraska – Lincoln.2016.
[Google Scholar]
[15]Jeong MS, Noh DH, Hong E, Lee KS, Kwon TH. Systematic modeling approach to selective plugging using in situ bacterial biopolymer production and its potential for microbial-enhanced oil recovery. Geomicrobiology Journal. 2019; 36(5):468-81.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Lee S, Im J, Cho GC, Chang I. Laboratory triaxial test behavior of xanthan gum biopolymer-treated sands. Geomechanics and Engineering .2019; 17(5):445-52.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Tran AT, Chang I, Cho GC. Soil water retention and vegetation survivability improvement using microbial biopolymers in drylands. Geomechanics and Engineering. 2019; 17(5):475-83.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Huang J, Kogbara RB, Hariharan N, Masad EA, Little DN. A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization. Construction and Building Materials. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Benzerara M, Guihéneuf S, Belouettar R, Perrot A. Combined and synergic effect of algerian natural fibres and biopolymers on the reinforcement of extruded raw earth. Construction and Building Materials. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Joga JR, Varaprasad BJ. Effect of xanthan gum biopolymer on dispersive properties of soils. World Journal of Engineering. 2020; 17(4):563-71.
[Google Scholar]
[21]Muguda S, Lucas G, Hughes PN, Augarde CE, Perlot C, Bruno AW, et al. Durability and hygroscopic behaviour of biopolymer stabilised earthen construction materials. Construction and Building Materials. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Saleh MS, Bala AB. The use of gum arabic as a lateretic soil stabilizer. Journal of Sciences and Multidisciplinary Research, Cenresin Publications. 2010.
[Google Scholar]
[23]Rigassi V. Compressed earth blocks: manual of production. CRAterre-EAG, GATE. 1985.
[Google Scholar]
[24]Randall RC, Phillips GO, Williams PA. The role of the proteinaceous component on the emulsifying properties of gum arabic. Food Hydrocolloids. 1988; 2(2):131-40.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Verbeken D, Dierckx S, Dewettinck K. Exudate gums: occurrence, production, and applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2003; 63(1):10-21.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]Elinwa AU, Abdulbasir G, Abdulkadir G. Gum Arabic as an admixture for cement concrete production. Construction and Building Materials. 2018; 176:201-12.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Satti SA, Ahmed YH. Use of gum Arabic (Acacia Seyal) as concrete admixture. In conference proceedings civil engineering 2018 (pp.198-202).
[Google Scholar]
[28]Athman CM, Abuodha SO, Nyomboi T. Use of gum Arabic as a superplasticizer in selfcompacting concrete. International Journal of Innovative Science and Modern Engineering. 2018; 5(4):8-13.
[Google Scholar]
[29]Mbugua R, Salim R, Ndambuki J. Effect of gum Arabic karroo as a water-reducing admixture in cement mortar. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2016; 5:100-11.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Bozabe RK, Toukourou CA, Gbaguidi GA, Hounkonnou MN. Study of the physico-mechanical characteristics of micro-concrete tiles produced locally from gum Arabic. Africa Science: International Journal of Science and Technology. 2013; 9 (1): 1-5.
[Google Scholar]
[31]Ndububa EE. Performance characteristics of gum Arabic bonded particleboard made from sawdust and wood shavings. IFE Journal of Technology. 2013; 22(1):5-8.
[Google Scholar]
[32]Vissac A, Bourgès A, Gandreau D, Anger R, Fontaine L. Clays & biopolymers - natural stabilizers for earthen construction. 2017.
[Google Scholar]
[33]Montenegro MA, Boiero ML, Valle L, Borsarelli CD. Gum Arabic: more than an edible emulsifier. Products and Applications of Biopolymers. 2012; 51:953-78.
[Google Scholar]
[34]Mohamed AM, Osman MH, Smaoui H, Mohd AMA. Permeability and tensile strength of concrete with Arabic gum biopolymer. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2017.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Elinwa AU, Umar M. X-ray diffraction and microstructure studies of gum Arabic-cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2017; 156:632-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Wang DY. Novel fire retardant polymers and composite materials. Woodhead Publishing; 2016.
[Google Scholar]
[37]Xavier KC, Santos MD, Santos MR, Oliveira ME, Carvalho MW, Osajima JA, et al. Effects of acid treatment on the clay palygorskite: XRD, surface area, morphological and chemical composition. Materials Research. 2014; 17:3-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Uzoegbo H. Dry-stack and compressed stabilised earth-block construction: exploring new frontiers in construction. Knowledge Exchange for Young Scientists (KEYS). 2016.
[Google Scholar]
[39]https://webstore.kebs.org/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=675. Accessed 25 September 2021.
[40]http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/handle/123456789/4856. Accessed 25 September 2021.
[41]https://global.ihs.com/doc_detail.cfm?document_name=BS%20EN%20772%2D1&item_s_key=00349060. Accessed 25 September 2021.
[42]Muhwezi L, Achanit SE. Effect of sand on the properties of compressed soil-cement stabilized blocks. Colloid and Surface Science. 2019; 4(1):1-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Salih MM, Osofero AI, Imbabi MS. Critical review of recent development in fiber reinforced adobe bricks for sustainable construction. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. 2020; 14:839-54.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Bakar BA, Saari S, Surip NA. Water absorption characteristic of interlocking compressed earth brick units. In AIP conference proceedings 2017. AIP Publishing LLC.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[45]Mohamed AM, Osman MH, Smaoui H, Mohd Ariffin MA. Durability and microstructure properties of concrete with arabic gum biopolymer admixture. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2018.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[46]Eltahir ME, Elsayed ME, Hamad MA. Assessment of local knowledge and traditional uses of Acacia senegal in rural areas of North Kordofan, Sudan. Agricultural Development within the Rural-Urban Continuum, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart-Hohenheim. 2013.
[Google Scholar]
[47]Muguda S, Booth SJ, Hughes PN, Augarde CE, Perlot C, Bruno AW, et al. Mechanical properties of biopolymer-stabilised soil-based construction materials. Géotechnique Letters. 2017; 7(4):309-14.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[48]Chang I, Im J, Prasidhi AK, Cho GC. Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening. Construction and Building Materials. 2015; 74:65-72.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[49]Ayeldeen M, Negm A, El-Sawwaf M, Kitazume M. Enhancing mechanical behaviors of collapsible soil using two biopolymers. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2017; 9(2):329-39.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[50]Rimbarngaye A, Mwero JN, Ronoh EK. Effect of gum arabic content on maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of laterite soil. Available at SSRN 3920303.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[51]ASTM E 2392. Standard guide for design of earthen wall building systems. New York, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials. 2010.
[Google Scholar]
[52]Salim W, Mbugua R, Ndambuki J. Influence of gum Arabica karoo in concrete and cement mortar as retarding and water admixture. In conference: 1st symposium knowledge exchange for young scientist (KEYS) 2015.
[53]Riza FV, Rahman IA, Zaidi AM. Possibility of lime as a stabilizer in compressed earth brick. In proceedings of the international conference on advanced science, engineering and information technology 2011.
[Google Scholar]
[54]Soltani A, Deng A, Taheri A, Mirzababaei M, Jaksa MB. A dimensional description of the unconfined compressive strength of artificially cemented fine-grained soils. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2020; 34(15):1679-703.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[55]Mazumdar B, Hafiza R, Uddin MM. Experimental study on cement stabilized earth block (CSEB). Accelerating the Worlds Research.2015.
[Google Scholar]