(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-8 Issue-83 October-2021
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : An adaptive threshold policy for host overload detection in cloud data centre
Author Name : Bhagyalakshmi and Deepti Malhotra
Abstract :

Excessive resource usage in a cloud computing system causes an increase in operational costs. In contrast, shortage of resources results in increased load on the server leading to Service Level Agreement Violation (SLAV) and reduced Quality of Service (QoS). Since, the workload is highly dynamic in nature, maintaining the utilization at optimal levels to effectively consume energy while keeping SLA integrated is a challenging task. To deal with the variability of the workload, the current research study focuses on calculating the upper threshold using past Central Processing Unit (CPU) utilization with the help of an adaptive threshold policy. The proposed Pn estimator based Adaptive Threshold policy (P_n_AT_H P) scheme implements an estimator Pn that periodically analyses the previous CPU utilization data of a host machine and sets the upper threshold accordingly. The results so obtained against traditional schemes of overload detection, show improvement in the performance metrics. According to the simulation analysis, the proposed P_n_AT_H P host overload detection scheme shows an improvement of 41.83% and 44.70%, compared to existing LRMMT and SNMMT schemes, in terms of the combined metric of energy, SLAVs, and the number of Virtual Machine (VM) migrations.

Keywords : Cloud computing, Dynamic virtual machine consolidation (DVMC), Host overload detection, Dynamic threshold.
Cite this article : Bhagyalakshmi , Malhotra D. An adaptive threshold policy for host overload detection in cloud data centre. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021; 8(83):1315-1335. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2021.874481.
References :
[1]https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/executive-perspectives/annual-internet-report/white-paper-c11-741490.html. Accessed: 10 October 2021.
[2]Koot M, Wijnhoven F. Usage impact on data center electricity needs: a system dynamic forecasting model. Applied Energy. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]Hintemann R, Hinterholzer S. Energy consumption of data centers worldwide-how will the internet become green? In ICT4S 2019.
[Google Scholar]
[4]Mastroianni C, Meo M, Papuzzo G. Probabilistic consolidation of virtual machines in self-organizing cloud data centers. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing. 2013; 1(2):215-28.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]Chen YW, Chang JM. EMaaS: Cloud-based energy management service for distributed renewable energy integration. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2015; 6(6):2816-24.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Zhou Z, Abawajy JH, Li F, Hu Z, Chowdhury MU, Alelaiwi A, Li K. Fine-grained energy consumption model of servers based on task characteristics in cloud data center. IEEE Access. 2017; 6:27080-90.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]Xiao H, Hu Z, Li K. Multi-objective VM consolidation based on thresholds and ant colony system in cloud computing. IEEE Access. 2019; 7:53441-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Bala M, Padha D. An adaptive overload detection policy based on the estimator sn in cloud environment. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology. 2017; 8(3):93-107.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Zhu X, Young D, Watson BJ, Wang Z, Rolia J, Singhal S, et al. 1000 islands: integrated capacity and workload management for the next generation data center. In international conference on autonomic computing 2008 (pp. 172-81). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Gmach D, Rolia J, Cherkasova L, Belrose G, Turicchi T, Kemper A. An integrated approach to resource pool management: policies, efficiency and quality metrics. In international conference on dependable systems and networks with FTCS and DCC (DSN) 2008 (pp. 326-35). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Beloglazov A, Abawajy J, Buyya R. Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient management of data centers for cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2012; 28(5):755-68.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[12]Li H, Zhu G, Cui C, Tang H, Dou Y, He C. Energy-efficient migration and consolidation algorithm of virtual machines in data centers for cloud computing. Computing. 2016; 98(3):303-17.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Fard SY, Ahmadi MR, Adabi S. A dynamic VM consolidation technique for QoS and energy consumption in cloud environment. The Journal of Supercomputing. 2017; 73(10):4347-68.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Buyya R, Beloglazov A, Abawajy J. Energy-efficient management of data center resources for cloud computing: a vision, architectural elements, and open challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1006.0308. 2010.
[Google Scholar]
[15]Monil MA, Rahman RM. Implementation of modified overload detection technique with VM selection strategies based on heuristics and migration control. In international conference on computer and information science 2015 (pp. 223-7). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Minarolli D, Mazrekaj A, Freisleben B. Tackling uncertainty in long-term predictions for host overload and underload detection in cloud computing. Journal of Cloud Computing. 2017; 6:1-18.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Li Z, Yan C, Yu X, Yu N. Bayesian network-based virtual machines consolidation method. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2017; 69:75-87.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Melhem SB, Agarwal A, Goel N, Zaman M. A markov-based prediction model for host load detection in live VM migration. In 5th international conference on future internet of things and cloud 2017 (pp. 32-8). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Li Z. An adaptive overload threshold selection process using markov decision processes of virtual machine in cloud data center. Cluster Computing. 2019; 22(2):3821-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Hsieh SY, Liu CS, Buyya R, Zomaya AY. Utilization-prediction-aware virtual machine consolidation approach for energy-efficient cloud data centers. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing. 2020; 139:99-109.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]Masoumzadeh SS, Hlavacs H. An intelligent and adaptive threshold-based schema for energy and performance efficient dynamic VM consolidation. In European conference on energy efficiency in large scale distributed systems 2013 (pp. 85-97). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Salimian L, Esfahani FS, Nadimi-Shahraki MH. An adaptive fuzzy threshold-based approach for energy and performance efficient consolidation of virtual machines. Computing. 2016; 98(6):641-60.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[23]Farahnakian F, Liljeberg P, Plosila J. LiRCUP: linear regression based CPU usage prediction algorithm for live migration of virtual machines in data centers. In Euromicro conference on software engineering and advanced applications 2013 (pp. 357-64). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Mao L, Qi D, Lin W, Zhu C. A self-adaptive prediction algorithm for cloud workloads. International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing. 2015; 7(2):65-76.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Yadav R, Zhang W. MeReg: managing energy-SLA tradeoff for green mobile cloud computing. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2017.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]Jararweh Y, Issa MB, Daraghmeh M, Al-ayyoub M, Alsmirat MA. Energy efficient dynamic resource management in cloud computing based on logistic regression model and median absolute deviation. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems. 2018; 19:262-74.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Mapetu JP, Kong L, Chen Z. A dynamic VM consolidation approach based on load balancing using pearson correlation in cloud computing. The Journal of Supercomputing. 2021; 77(6):5840-81.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Xie L, Chen S, Shen W, Miao H. A novel self-adaptive VM consolidation strategy using dynamic multi-thresholds in IAAS clouds. Future Internet. 2018; 10(6):1-18.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Zhou H, Li Q, Choo KK, Zhu H. DADTA: A novel adaptive strategy for energy and performance efficient virtual machine consolidation. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing. 2018; 121:15-26.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Sharma O, Saini H. VM consolidation for cloud data center using median based threshold approach. Procedia Computer Science. 2016; 89:27-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]Farahnakian F, Bahsoon R, Liljeberg P, Pahikkala T. Self-adaptive resource management system in IAAS clouds. In international conference on cloud computing 2016 (pp. 553-60). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[32]Dambreville A, Tomasik J, Cohen J, Dufoulon F. Load prediction for energy-aware scheduling for cloud computing platforms. In international conference on distributed computing systems 2017 (pp. 2604-7). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Saadi Y, El KS. Energy-efficient strategy for virtual machine consolidation in cloud environment. Soft Computing. 2020; 24(19):14845-59.
[Google Scholar]
[34]Tarr G, Müller S, Weber N. A robust scale estimator based on pairwise means. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics. 2012; 24(1):187-99.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Calheiros RN, Ranjan R, Beloglazov A, De RCA, Buyya R. CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Software: Practice and Experience. 2011; 41(1):23-50.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Beloglazov A, Buyya R. Optimal online deterministic algorithms and adaptive heuristics for energy and performance efficient dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in cloud data centers. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. 2012; 24(13):1397-420.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[37]Beloglazov A. Energy-efficient management of virtual machines in data centers for cloud computing (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Melbourne, 2013.
[Google Scholar]
[38]Park K, Pai VS. CoMon: a mostly-scalable monitoring system for PlanetLab. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. 2006; 40(1):65-74.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[39]Lange KD. Identifying shades of green: the sPECpower benchmarks. Computer. 2009; 42(3):95-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]