(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-9 Issue-86 January-2022
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Performance analysis of liver tumor classification using machine learning algorithms
Author Name : Munipraveena Rela, Suryakari Nagaraja Rao and Patil Ramana Reddy
Abstract :

Liver is most important organ in human body. Mainly there are two types of liver cancers- “liver abscess (LA), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)”. Computed tomography (CT) is used to identify these liver cancers. The shape of liver, tumor, and tumor location changes with patients, hence it is very difficult to classify liver tumors. Early detection of liver cancers such as LA and HCC are very essential to reduce the mortality rate. Medical image analysis techniques are used for identification of liver abnormalities. In this paper, different machine learning algorithms such as support vector machine (SVM), K-Nearest neighbour (KNN), decision tree (DT), ensemble, and naive Bayes (NB) are used to classify the tumor as LA, and HCC. The steps required for classification are “preprocessing, liver segmentation, feature extraction, and classification”. 68 CT images are collected from different hospitals in Tirupati to train the model, and the models are validated using accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, Matthew correlation coefficient (MCC), and F1-score etc. From the performance analysis of different classifiers, it is observations that accuracy of SVM classifier is improved by 10%, specificity is improved by 40%, sensitivity is improved by 28%, precision is improved by 66.67%, MCC is improved by 8%, F1-score is improved 4%, and kappa is improved by 20.14% compare to KNN, whereas error is reduced by 33%. SVM performance is also improved by 22.22%, 45.83%, 40%, 62%, 20%, and 70% with respect to accuracy, precision, specificity, MCC, F1-score, and kappa compared to DT classifier whereas 50% reduction in error. We can conclude that SVM classifier gives better performance compare to all other classifiers in the study.

Keywords : Liver, Liver tumor, CT images, Medical image analysis, Segmentation, SVM, KNN.
Cite this article : Rela M, Rao SN, Reddy PR. Performance analysis of liver tumor classification using machine learning algorithms . International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(86):143-154. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2021.87465.
References :
[1]Rela M, Suryakari NR, Reddy PR. Liver tumor segmentation and classification: a systematic review. In IEEE-HYDCON 2020 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[2]Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2011; 61(2):69-90.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]Bucak İÖ, Baki S. Diagnosis of liver disease by using CMAC neural network approach. Expert Systems with Applications. 2010; 37(9):6157-64.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Ruskó L, Bekes G, Fidrich M. Automatic segmentation of the liver from multi-and single-phase contrast-enhanced CT images. Medical Image Analysis. 2009; 13(6):871-82.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]Das A, Das P, Panda SS, Sabut S. Detection of liver cancer using modified fuzzy clustering and decision tree classifier in CT images. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. 2019; 29(2):201-11.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538230/. Accessed 23 July 2021.
[7]Balogh J, Victor III D, Asham EH, Burroughs SG, Boktour M, Saharia A, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 2016; 3:41-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Li BN, Chui CK, Chang S, Ong SH. A new unified level set method for semi-automatic liver tumor segmentation on contrast-enhanced CT images. Expert Systems with Applications. 2012; 39(10):9661-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Rela M, Rao SN, Reddy PR. Liver tumor segmentation using superpixel based fast fuzzy C means clustering. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 2020; 11(11):380-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Ranjbarzadeh R, Saadi SB. Automated liver and tumor segmentation based on concave and convex points using fuzzy c-means and mean shift clustering. Measurement. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Machhale K, Nandpuru HB, Kapur V, Kosta L. MRI brain cancer classification using hybrid classifier (SVM-KNN). In international conference on industrial instrumentation and control 2015 (pp. 60-5). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[12]Nadira T, Rustam Z. Classification of cancer data using support vector machines with features selection method based on global artificial bee colony. In AIP conference proceedings 2018. AIP Publishing LLC.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Starmans MP, Miclea RL, Van DVSR, Niessen WJ, Thomeer MG, Klein S. Classification of malignant and benign liver tumors using a radiomics approach. In medical imaging: image processing 2018. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Zhen SH, Cheng M, Tao YB, Wang YF, Juengpanich S, Jiang ZY, et al. Deep learning for accurate diagnosis of liver tumor based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data. Frontiers in Oncology. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]Trivizakis E, Manikis GC, Nikiforaki K, Drevelegas K, Constantinides M, Drevelegas A, et al. Extending 2-D convolutional neural networks to 3-D for advancing deep learning cancer classification with application to MRI liver tumor differentiation. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2018; 23(3):923-30.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Kutlu H, Avcı E. A novel method for classifying liver and brain tumors using convolutional neural networks, discrete wavelet transform and long short-term memory networks. Sensors. 2019; 19(9):1-16.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Rela M, Nagaraja RS, Ramana RP. Optimized segmentation and classification for liver tumor segmentation and classification using opposition‐based spotted hyena optimization. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology. 2021; 31(2):627-56.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Balagourouchetty L, Pragatheeswaran JK, Pottakkat B, Ramkumar G. GoogLeNet-based ensemble FCNet classifier for focal liver lesion diagnosis. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2019; 24(6):1686-94.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Budak Ü, Guo Y, Tanyildizi E, Şengür A. Cascaded deep convolutional encoder-decoder neural networks for efficient liver tumor segmentation. Medical Hypotheses. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Zhang D, Chen B, Chong J, Li S. Weakly-supervised teacher-student network for liver tumor segmentation from non-enhanced images. Medical Image Analysis. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]Devi RM, Seenivasagam V. Automatic segmentation and classification of liver tumor from CT image using feature difference and SVM based classifier-soft computing technique. Soft Computing. 2020; 24(24):18591-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Krishan A, Mittal D. Ensembled liver cancer detection and classification using CT images. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2021; 235(2):232-44.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[23]Burges CJ. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 1998; 2(2):121-67.
[Google Scholar]
[24]Keller JM, Gray MR, Givens JA. A fuzzy k-nearest neighbor algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1985; 15(4):580-5.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]https://analyticsindiamag.com/basics-of-ensemble-learning-in-classification-techniques-explained. Accessed 23 August 2021.
[26]Sairamya NJ, Susmitha L, George ST, Subathra MS. Hybrid approach for classification of electroencephalographic signals using time–frequency images with wavelets and texture features. In intelligent data analysis for biomedical applications 2019 (pp. 253-73). Academic Press.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Chandra Prabha K, Bharathi C. Texture analysis using GLCM & GLRLM feature extraction methods. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology. 2019; 7(5):2059-64.
[Google Scholar]