(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-10 Issue-108 November-2023
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Disaster mitigation preparedness of Semeru volcano eruption
Author Name : Fadly Usman, Keisuke Murakami and Eddi Basuki Kurniawan
Abstract :

The eruption of Semeru Volcano on January 16, 2021, in East Java, Indonesia, posed a complex natural disaster. The response required adapting evacuation sites, routes, and emergency protocols while adhering to health guidelines. Most disaster preparedness studies use technical approaches under normal conditions, often neglecting health protocols. Our research focused on the Pronojiwo Sub-District in Lumajang, East Java, the area closest to Semeru Volcano and most at risk. We employed shelter plan analysis, spatial analysis, and numerical simulation. The study aimed to assess the affected area following Semeru’s eruption, considering critical factors like the impacted region, shelter availability, and evacuation routes. Numerical simulations revealed lava flows at 20 m/s with heights up to 3m. Notably, lava distribution exceeded predefined disaster-prone zones due to interaction with rainwater, extending beyond established boundaries. Shelter plan analysis indicated some shelters were unsuitable for temporary accommodation due to their location in areas affected by cold lava flows. Spatial analysis findings showed that shelter coverage areas remained insufficient to serve the residential zones around Mount Semeru impacted by the eruption’s material flow. This research will serve as a valuable reference for government authorities, helping them determine effective evacuation routes and suitable shelters for refugees during future Mount Semeru eruptions, ensuring the safety and well-being of affected communities.

Keywords : Eruption, Disaster management, Numerical simulation, Spatial analysis, Shelter plan analysis.
Cite this article : Usman F, Murakami K, Kurniawan EB. Disaster mitigation preparedness of Semeru volcano eruption. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2023; 10(108):1524-1536. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2023.10101719.
References :
[1]Cahyadi MN, Bawasir A, Arief S, Widodo A, Rusli M, Kusumawardani D, et al. Analysis of the effect of the 2021 Semeru eruption on water vapor content and atmospheric particles using GNSS and remote sensing. Geodesy and Geodynamics. 2023.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[2]Marliyani GI, Helmi H, Arrowsmith JR, Clarke A. Volcano morphology as an indicator of stress orientation in the Java Volcanic Arc, Indonesia. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 2020; 400:106912.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]Starheim CC, Gomez C, Davies T, Lavigne F, Wassmer P. In-flow evolution of lahar deposits from video-imagery with implications for post-event deposit interpretation, Mount Semeru, Indonesia. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 2013; 256:96-104.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Smekens JF, Clarke AB, Burton MR, Harijoko A, Wibowo HE. SO2 emissions at Semeru volcano, Indonesia: characterization and quantification of persistent and periodic explosive activity. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 2015; 300:121-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]Thouret JC, Wavelet E, Taillandier M, Tjahjono B, Jenkins SF, Azzaoui N, et al. Defining population socio-economic characteristics, hazard knowledge and risk perception: the adaptive capacity to persistent volcanic threats from Semeru, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022; 77:103064.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Solikhin A, Thouret JC, Gupta A, Harris AJ, Liew SC. Geology, tectonics, and the 2002–2003 eruption of the Semeru volcano, Indonesia: interpreted from high-spatial resolution satellite imagery. Geomorphology. 2012; 138(1):364-79.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]Gomez C, Lavigne F, Hadmoko DS, Wassmer P. Insights into lahar deposition processes in the Curah Lengkong (Semeru volcano, Indonesia) using photogrammetry-based geospatial analysis, near-surface geophysics and CFD modelling. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 2018; 353:102-13.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8] Sakamoto M, Sasaki D, Ono Y, Makino Y, Kodama EN. Implementation of evacuation measures during natural disasters under conditions of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic based on a review of previous responses to complex disasters in Japan. Progress in Disaster Science. 2020; 8:100127.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Kassouk Z, Thouret JC, Gupta A, Solikhin A, Liew SC. Object-oriented classification of a high-spatial resolution SPOT5 image for mapping geology and landforms of active volcanoes: Semeru case study, Indonesia. Geomorphology. 2014; 221:18-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Thouret JC, Lavigne F, Suwa H, Sukatja B, Surono. Volcanic hazards at Mount Semeru, East Java (Indonesia), with emphasis on lahars. Bulletin of Volcanology. 2007; 70:221-44.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Siswowidjoyo S, Sudarsono U, Wirakusumah AD. The threat of hazards in the Semeru volcano region in East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 1997; 15(2-3):185-94.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[12]Vecere A, Monteiro R, Ammann WJ, Giovinazzi S, Santos RH. Predictive models for post disaster shelter needs assessment. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2017; 21:44-62.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Joyce KE, Wright KC, Samsonov SV, Ambrosia VG. Remote sensing and the disaster management cycle. Advances in geoscience and remote sensing. 2009; 48(7):317-46.
[Google Scholar]
[14]Mahiddin NA, Affandi FF, Mohamad Z. A review on mobility models in disaster area scenario. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021; 8(80):848-73.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]Ayuningtyas D, Windiarti S, Hadi MS, Fasrini UU, Barinda S. Disaster preparedness and mitigation in Indonesia: a narrative review. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2021; 50(8):1536-47.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Valachamy M, Sahibuddin S, Ahmad NA, Bakar NA. Critical success factors for geospatial data sharing in disaster management. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science 2022 (pp. 1-10). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Manfré LA, Hirata E, Silva JB, Shinohara EJ, Giannotti MA, Larocca AP, et al. An analysis of geospatial technologies for risk and natural disaster management. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2012; 1(2):166-85.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Appleby-arnold S, Brockdorff N, Jakovljev I, Zdravković S. Applying cultural values to encourage disaster preparedness: lessons from a low-hazard country. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2018; 31:37-44.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Ekaputra RA, Lee C, Kee SH, Yee JJ. Emergency shelter geospatial location optimization for flood disaster condition: a review. Sustainability. 2022; 14(19):1-15.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Usman F, Murakami K, Shoimah F, Nabila MA. Evacuation route during a disaster with health protocol in the new normal era. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science 2021 (pp. 1-8). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]Farhan A, Akhyar H. Analysis of tsunami disaster map by geographic information system (GIS): Aceh Singkil-Indonesia. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science 2017 (pp. 1-8). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Bilotta G, Cappello A, Hérault A, Del NC. Influence of topographic data uncertainties and model resolution on the numerical simulation of lava flows. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2019; 112:1-5.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[23]Shoimah F, Usman F, Hariyani S. Tsunami risk reduction in the new normal era based on community building in Watulimo, Indonesia. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science 2021 (pp. 1-8). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Makinoshima F, Oishi Y, Imamura F. Mechanism of an evacuation cascade during the 2011 Tohoku tsunami inferred from an evacuation simulation incorporating communications in social networks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022; 71:102810.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Shoimah F, Usman F, Hariyani S. Formulation of framework for evacuation of tsunami disaster after COVID-19 pandemic on the south coast of watulimo, trenggalek. Tataloka. 2022; 24(2):131-40.
[Google Scholar]
[26]Tinti S, Pagnoni G, Zaniboni F. The landslides and tsunamis of the 30th of December 2002 in Stromboli analysed through numerical simulations. Bulletin of Volcanology. 2006; 68:462-79.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Scifoni S, Coltelli M, Marsella M, Proietti C, Napoleoni Q, Vicari A, et al. Mitigation of lava flow invasion hazard through optimized barrier configuration aided by numerical simulation: the case of the 2001 Etna eruption. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 2010; 192(1-2):16-26.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Pfeiffer T, Costa A, Macedonio G. A model for the numerical simulation of Tephra fall deposits. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 2005; 140(4):273-94.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Bilotta G, Cappello A, Hérault A, Vicari A, Russo G, Del NC. Sensitivity analysis of the MAGFLOW cellular automaton model for lava flow simulation. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2012; 35:122-31.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Qiao C, Chen Y, Chen X. Numerical simulation of the erosion effect caused by the impact of high-velocity landslide. Shock and Vibration. 2022; 2022:1-16.
[Google Scholar]
[31]Vallés P, Echeverribar I, Mairal J, Martínez-aranda S, Fernández-pato J, García-navarro P. 2D numerical simulation of floods in Ebro river and analysis of boundary conditions to model the Mequinenza reservoir dam. GeoHazards. 2023; 4(2):136-56.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[32]Putra FP, Fajar SN, Aditya P, Apriliani E, Arif DK. Numerical simulation of tsunami propagation with finite difference method and Runge Kutta 4th order method (study case: south coast of Java island). In journal of physics: conference series 2019 (pp. 1-10). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Watts P. Wavemaker curves for tsunamis generated by underwater landslides. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 1998; 124(3):127-37.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[34]Usman F, Wicaksono AD, Setiawan E. Evaluation of the reduction of tsunami damages based on local wisdom contermeasures in Indonesia. Review European. Studies. 2016; 8:157.
[Google Scholar]
[35]Reyes-hardy MP, Barraza FA, Birke JP, Cáceres AE, Pizarro MI. GIS-based volcanic hazards, vulnerability and risks assessment of the Guallatiri Volcano, Arica y Parinacota Region, Chile. Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 2021; 109:103262.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Han L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Ma Q, Alu S, Lang Q. Hazard assessment of earthquake disaster chains based on a bayesian network model and ArcGIS. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2019; 8(5):1-15.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[37]Windupranata W, Hanifa NR, Nusantara CA, Aristawati G, Arifianto MR. Analysis of tsunami hazard in the southern coast of West Java Province-Indonesia. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science 2020 (pp. 1-16). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Suharyanto A, Pujiraharjo A, Usman F, Murakami K, Deguchi C. Predicting tsunami inundated area and evacuation road based on local condition using GIS. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology. 2012; 1:5-11.
[Google Scholar]
[39]Shimura Y, Yamamoto K. Method of searching for earthquake disaster evacuation routes using multi-objective GA and GIS. Journal of Geographic Information System. 2014; 6(05):492-525.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[40]Ikeda Y, Inoue M. An evacuation route planning for safety route guidance system after natural disaster using multi-objective genetic algorithm. Procedia Computer Science. 2016; 96:1323-31.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[41]Rajani A, Varadarajan S. Monitoring volcanic activity of Barren Island, India using multi-sensor and thermal remote sensing. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(92):961-78.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[42]Suhari S, Siebenhüner M. Environmental geology for land use and regional planning in the Bandung Basin, West Java, Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences. 1993; 8(1-4):557-66.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Kokkala A, Marinos V. An engineering geological database for managing, planning and protecting intelligent cities: the case of Thessaloniki city in Northern Greece. Engineering Geology. 2022; 301:106617.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Lu X, Liu R, Xia L. Landscape planning and design and visual evaluation for landscape protection of geological environment. Journal of King Saud University-Science. 2023:102735.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[45]Zhang D, Mao Z, Gong M, Ren J, Zuo S, Chen X. Study on optimization of shelter locations and evacuation routes of gas leakage accidents in chemical industrial park. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2023; 177:556-67.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[46]Souza JS, Lim-apo FA, Varella L, Coelho AS, Souza JC. Multi-period optimization model for planning people allocation in shelters and distributing aid with special constraints. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2022; 79:101087.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[47]Ozbay E, Çavuş Ö, Kara BY. Shelter site location under multi-hazard scenarios. Computers & Operations Research. 2019; 106:102-18.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[48]Lim GJ, Zangeneh S, Baharnemati MR, Assavapokee T. A capacitated network flow optimization approach for short notice evacuation planning. European Journal of Operational Research. 2012; 223(1):234-45.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[49]Usman F, Murakami K, Kurniawan EB. Study on reducing tsunami inundation energy by the modification of topography based on local wisdom. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2014; 20:642-50.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[50]Liang B, Yang D, Qin X, Tinta T. A risk-averse shelter location and evacuation routing assignment problem in an uncertain environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(20):4007.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[51]Xu J, Yin X, Chen D, An J, Nie G. Multi-criteria location model of earthquake evacuation shelters to aid in urban planning. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2016; 20:51-62.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[52]Bayram V, Yaman H. A joint demand and supply management approach to large scale urban evacuation planning: evacuate or shelter-in-place, staging and dynamic resource allocation. European Journal of Operational Research. 2024; 313(1):171-91.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[53]Yazdani M, Haghani M. A dynamic emergency planning system for relocating vulnerable people to safe shelters in response to heat waves. Expert Systems with Applications. 2023:120224.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[54]Li AC, Nozick L, Xu N, Davidson R. Shelter location and transportation planning under hurricane conditions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2012; 48(4):715-29.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[55]Sutikno S, Murakami K. Application of spatial and network analysis to evaluate shelter plan for tsunami evacuation. Civil Engineering Dimension. 2015; 17(2):88-94.
[Google Scholar]