(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (IJACR)

ISSN (Print):2249-7277    ISSN (Online):2277-7970
Volume-6 Issue-26 September-2016
Full-Text PDF
DOI:10.19101/IJACR.2016.625016
Paper Title : Enhanced differential evolution algorithm for solving reactive power problem
Author Name : K. Lenin, B. Ravindhranath Reddy and M. Suryakalavathi
Abstract :

Differential evolution (DE) is one of the efficient evolutionary computing techniques that seem to be effective to handle optimization problems in many practical applications. Conversely, the performance of DE is not always flawless to guarantee fast convergence to the global optimum. It can certainly get inaction resulting in low accuracy of acquired results. An enhanced differential evolution (EDE) algorithm by integrating excited arbitrary confined search (EACS) to augment the performance of a basic DE algorithm have been proposed in this paper. EACS is a local search method that is excited to swap the present solution by a superior candidate in the neighbourhood. Only a small subset of arbitrarily selected variables is used in each step of the local exploration for randomly deciding the subsequent provisional solution. The proposed EDE has been tested in standard IEEE 30 bus test system. The simulation results show clearly about the better performance of the proposed algorithm in reducing the real power loss with control variables within the limits.

Keywords : Enhanced differential evolution, Excited arbitrary confined search, Optimal reactive power, Transmission loss.
Cite this article : K. Lenin, B. Ravindhranath Reddy and M. Suryakalavathi, " Enhanced differential evolution algorithm for solving reactive power problem " , International Journal of Advanced Computer Research (IJACR), Volume-6, Issue-26, September-2016 ,pp.172-176.DOI:10.19101/IJACR.2016.625016
References :
[1]Alsac O, Stott B. Optimal load flow with steady-state security. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems. 1974; PAS-93( 3):745-51.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[2]Lee KY, Park YM, Ortiz JL. A united approach to optimal real and reactive power dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems. 1985; PAS-104(5):1147-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]Monticelli A, Pereira MV, Granville S. Security-constrained optimal power flow with post-contingency corrective rescheduling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1987; 2(1):175-80.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Deeb N, Shahidehpour SM. Linear reactive power optimization in a large power network using the decomposition approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1990; 5(2):428-38.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]Hcbson E. Network constrained reactive power control using linear programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems. 1980 PAS-99(3):868-77.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Lee KY, Park YM, Ortiz JL. Fuel-cost minimisation for both real-and reactive-power dispatches. In IEE proceedings c-generation, transmission and distribution 1984 (pp. 85-93). IET.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]Mangoli MK, Lee KY, Park YM. Optimal real and reactive power control using linear programming. Electric Power Systems Research. 1993; 26(1):1-10.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Canizares CA, De Souza AC, Quintana VH. Comparison of performance indices for detection of proximity to voltage collapse. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 1996; 11(3):1441-50.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Berizzi A, Bovo C, Merlo M, Delfanti M. A GA approach to compare ORPF objective functions including secondary voltage regulation. Electric Power Systems Research. 2012; 84(1):187-94.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Roy PK, Ghoshal SP, Thakur SS. Optimal VAR control for improvements in voltage profiles and for real power loss minimization using biogeography based optimization. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2012; 43(1):830-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Hu Z, Wang X, Taylor G. Stochastic optimal reactive power dispatch: formulation and solution method. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2010; 32(6):615-21.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[12]Amoiralis EI, Georgilakis PS, Tsili MA, Kladas AG. Ant colony optimisation solution to distribution transformer planning problem. International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms. 2010; 2(4):316-35.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Price K, Storn RM, Lampinen JA. Differential evolution: a practical approach to global optimization. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
[Google Scholar]
[14]http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~storn/code.html. Accessed 26 May 2016.
[15]Epitropakis MG, Tasoulis DK, Pavlidis NG, Plagianakos VP, Vrahatis MN. Enhancing differential evolution utilizing proximity-based mutation operators. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 2011; 15(1):99-119.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Wu QH, Cao YJ, Wen JY. Optimal reactive power dispatch using an adaptive genetic algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 1998; 20(8):563-9.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Zhao B, Guo CX, Cao YJ. A multiagent-based particle swarm optimization approach for optimal reactive power dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2005;20(2):1070-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Mahadevan K, Kannan PS. Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization for reactive power dispatch. Applied Soft Computing. 2010; 10(2):641-52.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Khazali AH, Kalantar M. Optimal reactive power dispatch based on harmony search algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2011; 33(3):684-92.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Sakthivel S, Gayathri M, Manimozhi V. A nature inspired optimization algorithm for reactive power control in a power system. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. 2013; 2(1); 29-33.
[Google Scholar]