International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration ISSN (Print): 2394-5443    ISSN (Online): 2394-7454 Volume-12 Issue-123 February-2025
  1. 4774
    Citations
  2. 2.8
    CiteScore
NeuroPET: advancing breast cancer detection with an optimized deep convolutional spiking neural network

S. Tharani1 and R. Khanchana2

Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science,Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts & Science for Women, Coimbatore,India1
Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science,Sri Ramakrishna College of Arts & Science for Women, Coimbatore,India2
Corresponding Author : S. Tharani

Recieved : 25-March-2024; Revised : 04-February-2025; Accepted : 22-February-2025

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC), a heterogeneous disease, remains the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women globally. The development of effective treatment strategies and the identification of critical biomarkers capable of predicting cancer progression remains challenging due to the diverse characteristics of BC. While positron emission tomography (PET) and molecular imaging (MI) have enhanced the characterization of BC, these techniques still face certain limitations. Recently, deep learning (DL) methods have revolutionized medical imaging by enabling the detection and analysis of features often imperceptible to the human eye. To address these limitations, NeuroPET, a novel framework, was proposed to enhance the accuracy and reliability of PET imaging for BC detection and classification. NeuroPET integrates several advanced methods, including the dynamic grade weighted switching median filter (DGWSMF), designed to mitigate impulsive noise in colour digital images, and a novel spatial adaptive fuzzy c-means (SAFCM) clustering method, developed to segment affected regions in PET scan datasets. At the core of NeuroPET is the optimal deep convolutional spiking neural network (ODCSNN), which employs direct training for PET image classification. The network's weights are optimized using the adaptive nut-finding algorithm (ANFA), enabling superior performance. NeuroPET further utilizes the gradient surrogate method to achieve a high classification accuracy of 95.02%, surpassing traditional approaches. Comparative analysis demonstrates that NeuroPET significantly outperforms existing techniques, underscoring its potential as an advanced BC detection, classification, and analysis tool.

Keywords

Machine learning (ML), Breast cancer (BC), Positron emission tomography (PET), Data mining (DM).

Cite this article

Tharani S, Khanchana R. NeuroPET: advancing breast cancer detection with an optimized deep convolutional spiking neural network. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2025;12(123):254-275. DOI : 10.19101/IJATEE.2024.111100375

References
[1]
Rai R, Tripathi V. An overview of breast cancer epidemiology, risk factors, classification, genetics, diagnosis and treatment. Vantage Journal of Thematic Analysis. 2023; 4:45-67.
[Google Scholar]
[2]
Wilkinson L, Gathani T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern. The British Journal of Radiology. 2022; 95(1130):1-3.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]
Chamberlin MD. Global oncology: disparities, outcomes and innovations around the globe. An Issue of Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2023.
[Google Scholar]
[4]
Nayyar S, Chakole S, Taksande AB, Prasad R, Munjewar PK, Wanjari MB, et al. From awareness to action: a review of efforts to reduce disparities in breast cancer screening. Cureus. 2023; 15(6):1-11.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]
Sangwan RK, Huda RK, Panigrahi A, Toteja GS, Sharma AK, Thakor M, et al. Strengthening breast cancer screening program through health education of women and capacity building of primary healthcare providers. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023; 11:1-10.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]
Castorina L, Comis AD, Prestifilippo A, Quartuccio N, Panareo S, Filippi L, et al. Innovations in positron emission tomography and state of the art in the evaluation of breast cancer treatment response. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 13(1):1-20.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]
Cecil K, Huppert L, Mukhtar R, Dibble EH, Obrien SR, Ulaner GA, et al. Metabolic positron emission tomography in breast cancer. PET Clinics. 2023; 18(4):473-85.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]
Fowler AM, Miyake KK, Nakamoto Y. Clinical applications of dedicated breast positron emission tomography. PET Clinics. 2024; 19(1):105-17.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]
Xu K, Kang H. A review of machine learning approaches for brain positron emission tomography data analysis. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2024; 58(4):203-12.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]
Satoh Y, Imokawa T, Fujioka T, Mori M, Yamaga E, Takahashi K, et al. Deep learning for image classification in dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET). Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 2022; 36(4):401-10.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]
Perron J, Ko JH. Review of quantitative methods for the detection of Alzheimers disease with positron emission tomography. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(22):1-32.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[12]
Balkenende L, Teuwen J, Mann RM. Application of deep learning in breast cancer imaging. In seminars in nuclear medicine 2022 (pp. 584-96). WB Saunders.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]
Gu B, Yang Z, Du X, Xu X, Ou X, Xia Z, et al. Imaging of tumor stroma using 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT to improve diagnostic accuracy of primary tumors in head and neck cancer of unknown primary: a comparative imaging trial. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2024; 65(3):365-71.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]
Sherman ME, Vierkant RA, Winham SJ, Vachon CM, Carter JM, Pacheco-spann L, et al. Benign breast disease and breast cancer risk in the percutaneous biopsy era. JAMA surgery. 2024; 159(2):193-201.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]
Inglese M, Ferrante M, Duggento A, Boccato T, Toschi N. Spatiotemporal learning of dynamic positron emission tomography data improves diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences. 2023; 7(6):630-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]
Khodabakhshi Z, Amini M, Hajianfar G, Oveisi M, Shiri I, Zaidi H. Dual-centre harmonised multimodal positron emission tomography/computed tomography image radiomic features and machine learning algorithms for non-small cell lung cancer histopathological subtype phenotype decoding. Clinical oncology. 2023; 35(11):713-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]
Qiao X, Jiang C, Li P, Yuan Y, Zeng Q, Bi L, et al. Improving breast tumor segmentation in PET via attentive transformation based normalization. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 2022; 26(7):3261-71.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]
Imokawa T, Satoh Y, Fujioka T, Takahashi K, Mori M, Kubota K, et al. Deep learning model with collage images for the segmentation of dedicated breast positron emission tomography images. Breast Cancer. 2023:1-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]
Tsukijima M, Teramoto A, Kojima A, Yamamuro O, Tamaki T, Fujita H. A position-adaptive noise-reduction method using a deep denoising filter bank for dedicated breast positron emission tomography images. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 2024; 47(1):73-85.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]
Sueoka S, Sasada S, Masumoto N, Emi A, Kadoya T, Okada M. Performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in the detection of small and low-grade breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2021; 187:125-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]
Yurdusev AA, Adem K, Hekim M. Detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms images using difference filter and Yolov4 deep learning model. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2023; 80(2):104360.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]
Nogales A, Perez-lara F, García-tejedor ÁJ. Enhancing breast cancer diagnosis with deep learning and evolutionary algorithms: a comparison of approaches using different thermographic imaging treatments. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2024; 83(14):42955-71.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[23]
Singh L, Alam A. An efficient hybrid methodology for an early detection of breast cancer in digital mammograms. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2024; 15(1):337-60.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]
Thakur A, Gupta M, Sinha DK, Mishra KK, Venkatesan VK, Guluwadi S. Transformative breast cancer diagnosis using CNNs with optimized reduceLROnplateau and early stopping enhancements. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems. 2024; 17(1):1-18.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]
Munshi RM, Cascone L, Alturki N, Saidani O, Alshardan A, Umer M. A novel approach for breast cancer detection using optimized ensemble learning framework and XAI. Image and Vision Computing. 2024; 142:104910.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]
Chugh G, Kumar S, Singh N. TransNet: a comparative study on breast carcinoma diagnosis with classical machine learning and transfer learning paradigm. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2024; 83(11):33855-77.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]
Raza A, Ullah N, Khan JA, Assam M, Guzzo A, Aljuaid H. DeepBreastCancerNet: a novel deep learning model for breast cancer detection using ultrasound images. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(4):1-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]
Sahu A, Das PK, Meher S. High accuracy hybrid CNN classifiers for breast cancer detection using mammogram and ultrasound datasets. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2023; 80(1):104292.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]
Emam MM, Houssein EH, Samee NA, Alohali MA, Hosney ME. Breast cancer diagnosis using optimized deep convolutional neural network based on transfer learning technique and improved coati optimization algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications. 2024; 255:124581.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]
Qian L, Bai J, Huang Y, Zeebaree DQ, Saffari A, Zebari DA. Breast cancer diagnosis using evolving deep convolutional neural network based on hybrid extreme learning machine technique and improved chimp optimization algorithm. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2024; 87:105492.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]
Gutierrez C, Owens A, Medeiros L, Dabydeen D, Sritharan N, Phatak P, et al. Breast cancer detection using enhanced IRI-numerical engine and inverse heat transfer modeling: model description and clinical validation. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14(1):1-17.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[32]
Huang Q, Ding H, Effatparvar M. Breast cancer diagnosis based on hybrid SqueezeNet and improved chef-based optimizer. Expert Systems with Applications. 2024; 237:121470.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]
https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/collection/qin-breast/. Accessed 25 January 2025.