Effect of sealed curing on G40 grade geopolymer concrete incorporating fly ash and GGBS
Sharada Polusani1, V Vinayaka Ram2 and M V Seshagiri Rao3
Department of Civil Engineering,Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad,Telangana,India1
Department of Civil Engineering,BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad,Telangana,India2
Department of Civil Engineering,CVR Engineering College, Hyderabad,Telangana,India3
Department of Civil Engineering,BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad,Telangana,India2
Department of Civil Engineering,CVR Engineering College, Hyderabad,Telangana,India3
Corresponding Author : Sharada Polusani
Recieved : 25-March-2024; Revised : 23-March-2025; Accepted : 25-March-2025
Abstract
Geopolymer binders are created by mixing precursors rich in silica (Si) and aluminium (Al), such as fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), with specific amounts of alkaline reagents like sodium or potassium silicates and hydroxides. This study aimed to develop geopolymer concrete suitable for pavement quality concrete (PQC) by utilizing fly ash and GGBS as precursors, combined with sodium silicate (Na₂SiO₃) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as alkaline reagents. Two different mixes were prepared using a fly ash to GGBS ratio of 75:25 and 60:40. Each mix was subjected to two types of curing conditions: one group of specimens was completely sealed with 100-micron thick plastic sheets and stored at room temperature, while the other group was left exposed without any plastic covering. Research was conducted on the mechanical strength, sorptivity, amount of non-evaporable water, and the microstructure of the concrete specimens. The findings revealed that the sealed specimens exhibited lower sorptivity, higher compressive strength, and retained a greater amount of non-evaporable water compared to the open-cured specimens. Sealing the concrete effectively prevented the loss of surface water, thereby minimizing the formation of air voids on the surface and promoting the retention of a greater amount of inbound water. The microstructure of the sealed concrete specimens was denser, more compact, and contained a higher Silica to Alumina (Si/Al) content compared to the open-cured specimens.
Keywords
Geopolymer concrete, Sealed curing, Fly ash, Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), Mechanical and microstructural properties, Sustainable construction materials.
Cite this article
Polusani S, Ram VV, Rao MS. Effect of sealed curing on G40 grade geopolymer concrete incorporating fly ash and GGBS. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2025;12(124):370-384. DOI : 10.19101/IJATEE.2024.111100376
References
[1]
Zhaurova M, Soukka R, Horttanainen M. Multi-criteria evaluation of CO2 utilization options for cement plants using the example of Finland. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2021; 112:1-11.
[2]
Shakor P, Hasan S, Awuzie BO, Singh AK, Rauniyar A, Karakouzian M. Evaluating the potential of geopolymer concrete as a sustainable alternative for thin white-topping pavement. Frontiers in Materials. 2023; 10:1-14.
[3]
Junaid MT, Kayali O, Khennane A, Black J. A mix design procedure for low calcium alkali activated fly ash-based concretes. Construction and Building Materials. 2015; 79:301-10.
[4]
Li N, Shi C, Zhang Z, Wang H, Liu Y. A review on mixture design methods for geopolymer concrete. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2019; 178:107490.
[5]
Pavithra P, Reddy MS, Dinakar P, Rao BH, Satpathy BK, Mohanty AN. A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016; 133:117-25.
[6]
Serag FA, Sofi WH, Taha AZ, El-yamani MA, Tawfik TA. Mix design proposed for geopolymer concrete mixtures based on ground granulated blast furnace slag. Australian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2020; 18(2):205-18.
[7]
Anuradha R, Sreevidya V, Venkatasubramani R, Rangan BV. Modified guidelines for geopolymer concrete mix design using Indian standard. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2011:353-64.
[8]
Fernández-jiménez A, Palomo Á, Sobrados I, Sanz J. The role played by the reactive alumina content in the alkaline activation of fly ashes. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2006; 91(1-3):111-9.
[9]
Fernández-jiménez A, Palomo A. Mid-infrared spectroscopic studies of alkali-activated fly ash structure. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2005; 86(1-3):207-14.
[10]
Kovalchuk G, Fernández-jiménez A, Palomo A. Alkali-activated fly ash: effect of thermal curing conditions on mechanical and microstructural development-part II. Fuel. 2007; 86(3):315-22.
[11]
Deb PS, Nath P, Sarker PK. The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Materials & Design (1980-2015). 2014; 62:32-9.
[12]
Rautaray SK, Bera DK, Rath AK. The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash based self compacting geo-polymer concrete on the workability and strength properties at ambient curing. In recent developments in sustainable infrastructure 2022 (pp. 567-79). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[13]
Kannangara T, Guerrieri M, Fragomeni S, Joseph P. Effects of initial surface evaporation on the performance of fly ash-based geopolymer paste at elevated temperatures. Applied Sciences. 2021; 12(1):1-18.
[14]
Humad A. Shrinkage and related properties of alkali-activated binders based on high MgO blast furnace slag. Doctoral Dissertation, Luleå University of Technology. 2019.
[15]
Wu R, Gu Q, Gao X, Huang J, Guo Y, Zhang H. Effect of curing conditions on the alkali-activated blends: microstructure, performance and economic assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024; 445:141344.
[16]
Lee S, Van RA, Chon CM. Benefits of sealed-curing on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymers. Materials. 2016; 9(7):1-11.
[17]
Davidovits J. Chemistry of geopolymeric systems, terminology. In geopolymer 1999 (pp. 9-39).
[18]
ASTM International. ASTM C618-22, Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. 2022.
[19]
Collins F, Sanjayan JG. Microcracking and strength development of alkali activated slag concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2001; 23(4-5):345-52.
[20]
Nasir M, Mahmood AH, Bahraq AA. History, recent progress, and future challenges of alkali-activated binders–an overview. Construction and Building Materials. 2024; 426:1-20.
[21]
El-hassan H, Ismail N, Al HS, Alshehhi A, Al AN. Effect of GGBS and curing temperature on microstructure characteristics of lightweight geopolymer concrete. In MATEC web of conferences 2017 (pp. 1-10). EDP Sciences.
[22]
Wang H, Wu H, Xing Z, Wang R, Dai S. The effect of various Si/Al, Na/Al molar ratios and free water on micromorphology and macro-strength of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Materials. 2021; 14(14):1-16.
[23]
Vijai K, Kumutha R, Vishnuram BG. Effect of types of curing on strength of geopolymer concrete. International Journal of the Physical Sciences. 2010; 5(9):1419-23.
[24]
Palomo A, Grutzeck MW, Blanco MT. Alkali-activated fly ashes: a cement for the future. Cement and Concrete Research. 1999; 29(8):1323-9.
[25]
Perera DS, Uchida O, Vance ER, Finnie KS. Influence of curing schedule on the integrity of geopolymers. Journal of Materials Science. 2007; 42:3099-106.
[26]
Rafeet A, Vinai R, Soutsos M, Sha W. Effects of slag substitution on physical and mechanical properties of fly ash-based alkali activated binders (AABs). Cement and Concrete Research. 2019; 122:118-35.
[27]
Abhilash P, Sashidhar C, Reddy IR. Strength properties of fly ash and GGBS based geo-polymer concrete. International Journal of Chemical Tech Research. 2016; 9(3):350-6.
[28]
Tamilarasan A, Suganya OM. Effect of varying molarity and curing conditions on the mechanical and microstructural characteristics of alkali activated GGBS binder. Materials Research Express. 2023; 10(9):1-18.
[29]
Van JJG, Van DJS, Lukey GC. The effect of composition and temperature on the properties of fly ash-and kaolinite-based geopolymers. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2002; 89(1-3):63-73.
[30]
Steins P, Poulesquen A, Diat O, Frizon F. Structural evolution during geopolymerization from an early age to consolidated material. Langmuir. 2012; 28(22):8502-10.
[31]
Lizcano M, Gonzalez A, Basu S, Lozano K, Radovic M. Effects of water content and chemical composition on structural properties of alkaline activated metakaolin‐based geopolymers. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2012; 95(7):2169-77.
[32]
Mohamed OA. Effects of the curing regime, acid exposure, alkaline activator dosage, and precursor content on the strength development of mortar with alkali-activated slag and fly ash binder: a critical review. Polymers. 2023; 15(5):1-26.
[33]
Ghosh K, Ghosh P. Alkali-activated fly ash blast furnace slag composites. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press; 2021.
[34]
Helmy AI. Intermittent curing of fly ash geopolymer mortar. Construction and Building Materials. 2016; 110:54-64.
[35]
ASTM C 171 standard specification for sheet materials for curing concrete sheet materials for curing concrete. 2020.https://store.astm.org/c0171-20.html.
[36]
IS 519-1959: Method of tests for strength of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.516.1959.pdf
[37]
IS: 516-1959. Methods of tests for strength of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards. 1959:1-30.
[38]
ASTM C1585-04. Test method for measurement of rate of absorption of water by hydraulic-cement concretes. ASTM. 2004.
[39]
Zuhua Z, Xiao Y, Huajun Z, Yue C. Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer. Applied Clay Science. 2009; 43(2):218-23.
[40]
Zhao J, Wang A, Lyu B, Liu K, Chu Y, Ma R, et al. Proportioning factors of alkali-activated materials and interaction relationship revealed by response surface modeling. Materials. 2023; 16(5):1-21.
[41]
Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Mallicoat SW, Kriven WM, Van DJS. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2005; 269(1-3):47-58.
[42]
Duxson P, Fernández-jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, Van DJS. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science. 2007; 42:2917-33.
[43]
Ma J, Dehn F. Shrinkage and creep behavior of an alkali‐activated slag concrete. Structural Concrete. 2017; 18(5):801-10.
[44]
Nguyen TN, Phung QT, Jacques D, Elsen J, Pontikes Y. Microstructure and transport properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers subjected to accelerated leaching. Construction and Building Materials. 2024; 426:136225.
[45]
Collier NC, Sharp JH, Milestone NB, Hill J, Godfrey IH. The influence of water removal techniques on the composition and microstructure of hardened cement pastes. Cement and Concrete Research. 2008; 38(6):737-44.
[46]
Criado M, Fernández-jiménez A, Palomo A. Alkali activation of fly ash. part III: effect of curing conditions on reaction and its graphical description. Fuel. 2010; 89(11):3185-92.