International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration ISSN (Print): 2394-5443    ISSN (Online): 2394-7454 Volume-13 Issue-134 January-2026
  1. 4037
    Citations
  2. 2.7
    CiteScore
Ergonomic risks and the productivity rate of construction workers in concrete block installation

Hari Nuryanto1,  Setya Winarno1,  Hari Purnomo2 and Mochamad Teguh1

Department of Civil Engineering,Universitas Islam Indonesia,Yogyakarta 55584,Indonesia1
Department of Industrial Engineering,Universitas Islam Indonesia,Yogyakarta 55584,Indonesia2
Corresponding Author : Setya Winarno

Recieved : 25-Apr-2025; Revised : 18-Jan-2026; Accepted : 20-Jan-2026

Abstract

Concrete blocks are heavy construction materials that are often applied to shallow foundation work manually without adequate consideration of ergonomic risks. Furthermore, the implementation of ergonomic principles and risk management is linked to an enhanced productivity rate. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between ergonomic risks and the productivity rate of construction workers during concrete block installation. The methodology involves analysing the body postures of seven masons and their corresponding productivity rates during the construction of a 37.7-meter shallow foundation for a fence. This study reveals that excessive compression force (Fc) in the lumbosacral joint constitutes the predominant ergonomic risk. The current conventional shallow foundation construction method posed considerable ergonomic risks as the Fc exerted by the masons are beyond the recommended maximum limit. The masons’ application of ergonomic principles, such as maintaining the concrete block close to their body during lifting and lowering activities has reduced ergonomic risks. Masons must maintain a maximum horizontal distance of 0.56 meters between the load and the lumbosacral joint to mitigate these risks. Furthermore, masons must align their spines in a neutral position while in a squatting lifting posture and prevent excessive forward-bent trunk postures. The minimum safe torso angle limit is identified as 68 degrees. A moderate negative correlation (r=-0.55474) exists between ergonomic risk and the productivity rate.

Keywords

Ergonomic risk assessment, Construction worker productivity, Concrete block installation, Lumbosacral compression force, Manual material handling, Working posture analysis.

Cite this article

Nuryanto H, Winarno S, Purnomo H, Teguh M. Ergonomic risks and the productivity rate of construction workers in concrete block installation. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2026;13(134):1-18. DOI : 10.19101/IJATEE.2025.121220545

References

[1] Liu H, Yang X, Li J, Ding M, Song C, Li Y. Numerical simulation and experimental study on concrete block fabricated foundation. In international conference on civil engineering 2021 (pp. 263-72). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

[2] Garg A, Putz-anderson V, Waters TR. Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation (Superseded). NIOSH Numbered Publications, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 1964.

[3] Graziosi F, Bonfiglioli R, Decataldo F, Violante FS. Criteria for assessing exposure to biomechanical risk factors: a research-to-practice guide-part 1: general issues and manual material handling. Life. 2024; 14(11):1-13.

[4] https://www.spine-health.com/conditions/spine-anatomy/all-about-l5-s1-lumbosacral-joint. Accessed 22 December 2025.

[5] Hilmi AH, Hamid AR. Musculoskeletal disorders: industrial insights and ergonomic interventions. Malaysian Journal of Ergonomics (MJEr). 2023; 5:61-78.

[6] Sarip S, Saidin ZF, Kaidi HM, Suhot MA. Manual material handling in an automotive testing department using work movement task analysis. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021; 8(78):619-30.

[7] Soegoto ES, Purnama DG, Putra ML, Amtriana MS. Risk assessment of work posture in manufacturing industry workers for drilling pipes. In conference proceedings 2023. AIP Publishing LLC.

[8] Alqahtani FM, Abas M, Alkahtani M, Hayat M, Farrukh A. Enhancing sustainable safety practices in construction: insights from cultural and socio-economic analysis. Sustainability. 2024; 16(12):1-20.

[9] Botshabelo K, Sealetsa OJ, Setlhatlhanyo K, Moalosi R, Rapitsenyane Y, Dichabeng P. Designing ergonomic safety boots for sustainable construction in Botswana: a case study of worker foot health. Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism. 2024; 14:191-8.

[10] Supattananon N, Yawara P, Youngwilai A, Arkararungruangkul R. Productivity improvement through a work study with ergonomic risk assessment: a case study of a high-voltage line distribution operation. Engineering and Applied Science Research. 2022; 49(5):688-95.

[11] Singh MS, Tejaswini DN, Narwade R, Nagarajan K. Factors affecting the labour productivity of brickwork and analyzing them using RII method. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2019; 6(54):143-51.

[12] Yoon S, Chang T, Chi S. Developing an integrated construction safety management system for accident prevention. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2024; 40(6):1-16.

[13] Winarno S, Nuryanto H, Teguh M. Efficiency of the use of materials of concrete block against rubble stone on shallow foundation works. Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil. 2022; 28(1):67–78.

[14] Adhikari B, Ghimire A, Jha N, Karkee R, Shrestha A, Dhakal R, et al. Factors associated with low back pain among construction workers in Nepal: a cross-sectional study. PloS One. 2021; 16(6):1-16.

[15] Budiyanto T, Adiyanto O, Ma'ruf F, Haryadi H. Assessing musculoskeletal disorders (Msds) of workers of fired clay bricks industry. Logic: Jurnal Rancang Bangun Dan Teknologi. 2024; 24(1):24-30.

[16] Putri MV, Nugraha WN, Safitri KN. Assessing high-risk manual handling activities for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in PT DNL warehouse using rapid entire body assessment (REBA) and manual handling assessment chart (MAC). Jurnal Teknik Industri. 2024; 14(3):171-84.

[17] Reneman MF, Coenen P, Kuijer PP, Van DJH, Holtermann A, Igwesi-chidobe CN, et al. Tensions of low-back pain and lifting; bridging clinical low-back pain and occupational lifting guidelines. Journal of occupational rehabilitation. 2024; 34(3):473-80.

[18] Tandazo O, Jaramillo-carrión V, Valarezo E, Sanchís-almenara M, Montalbán-domingo L, Catalá-alís J. Ergonomic risk assessment in construction: case study ecuador. Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):1-8.

[19] Leggieri S, Fanti V, Caldwell DG, Di NC. Online ergonomic evaluation in realistic manual material handling task: proof of concept. Bioengineering. 2023; 11(1):1-14.

[20] Karim M, Islam F. Ergonomic design improvements to reduce workplace injuries in construction. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction. 2024;3(2):25–8.https://www.civilengineeringjournals.com/ijcec/article/31/5-2-6-921.pdf

[21] Menanno M, Riccio C, Benedetto V, Gissi F, Savino MM, Troiano L. An ergonomic risk assessment system based on 3D human pose estimation and collaborative robot. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(11):1-22.

[22] Hoke E, Heinzová R, Veselík P, Martinková M. Assessment of ergonomic risks in manufacturing enterprises in the Czech republic. Management and Production Engineering Review. 2024; 15(4):1-10.

[23] Zen ZH, Widia M, Sukadarin EH. Ergonomics risk assessment tools: a systematic review. Malaysian Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences. 2024; 20(5):289-300.

[24] Rybnikár F, Kačerová I, Hořejší P, Šimon M. Ergonomics evaluation using motion capture technology-literature review. Applied Sciences. 2022; 13(1):1-25.

[25] https://harperconstructionrecruitment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Preventing-injury-from-handling-heavy-blocks.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2025.

[26] Sambeko BE, Susanto N, Alfanan A. Manual handling as contributor of low back pain for workers: a case study at PT sumber mandiri jaya, kabupaten merauke. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health. 2024; 13(1):29-36.

[27] Widodo L, Ariyanti S, Jason A. Ergonomic intervention to improve the productivity of brick press tool in small and medium entreprise (SME) Akheng Kobar. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering 2020 (pp. 1-7). IOP Publishing.

[28] Rajendran M, Sajeev A, Shanmugavel R, Rajpradeesh T. Ergonomic evaluation of workers during manual material handling. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021; 46:7770-6.

[29] Tao Y, Hu H, Xue J, Zhang Z, Xu F. Evaluation of ergonomic risks for construction workers based on multicriteria decision framework with the integration of spherical fuzzy set and alternative queuing method. Sustainability. 2024; 16(10):1-20.

[30] https://harperconstructionrecruitment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Preventing-injury-from-handling-heavy-blocks.pdf. Accessed 26 November 2025.

[31] Gajbhiye MT, Banerjee D, Das S, Das C, Madhu U. Postural assessment of Indian masons and prototype design of work table. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review. 2024; 44:30-50.

[32] Martins DR, Cerqueira SM, Pombeiro A, Da SAF, Rocha AM, Santos CP. ErgoReport: a holistic posture assessment framework based on inertial data and deep learning. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2025; 25(7):1-26.

[33] Yang Z, Song D, Ning J, Wu Z. A systematic review: advancing ergonomic posture risk assessment through the integration of computer vision and machine learning techniques. IEEE Access. 2024; 12: 180481-519.

[34] Chen W, Gu D, Ke J. Real‐time ergonomic risk assessment in construction using a co‐learning‐powered 3D human pose estimation model. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 2024; 39(9):1337-53.

[35] Sutapa IK, Santiana IM, Wibawa IG, Yusuf M. Ergonomic risk analysis of occupational safety and health (K3) in construction workers in the Brawa. In proceedings of the international conference on sustainable green tourism applied science-engineering applied science 2024 (ICoSTAS-EAS 2024) 2024 (pp. 134-41). Springer Nature.

[36] Durante F, Antonelli MG, Zobel PB. Development of an active exoskeleton for assisting back movements in lifting weights. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research. 2018; 7(4):353-60.

[37] Pratiwi I, Setyawan R. Assessment of musculoskeletal disorders in brick workers using an ergonomic approach. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health. 2024; 13(3):311-8.

[38] Edem IE, Akinsola B. An approach to assessing human factors related occupational safety using behavioural observation-based indicators: the case of a construction site in Nigeria. Engineering and Applied Science Research. 2022; 49(2):133-45.

[39] Bariyah C, Kristanto A, Al KE, Kurniawan A. Analysis of environmental ergonomic and individual characteristic factors to cloth mask production output in small-medium enterprises. Engineering and Applied Science Research. 2024; 51(3):393-8.

[40] Kondratiev A, Smetankina N, Staude V. Biomechanical analysis of stress–strain distribution in the lumbar spine–sacrum–pelvis system with emphasis on sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Prosthesis. 2024; 7(1):1-19.

[41] Zhang C, Roossien CC, Verkerke GJ, Houdijk H, Hijmans JM, Greve C. Biomechanical load of neck and lumbar joints in open-surgery training. Sensors. 2023; 23(15):1-16.

[42] Beyrami S, Sahlabadi AS, Talebolhagh S, Ramezanifar S, Sahihazar ZM. Evaluation of compressive and shear forces exerted on the lower back in manual load handling tasks among young workers of selected block maker using 3DSSPP. International Journal of Occupational Hygiene. 2021; 13(1):49-63.

[43] Singh R, Kumar P, Wadhwani J, Yadav RK, Kaur S, Singh HD. Do MRI-derived muscle moment-arms in patients with chronic low back pain differ from healthy individuals? a comparative study. European Spine Journal. 2023; 32(4):1115-22.

[44] Hilmi AH, Hamid AR, Ibrahim WA. Current trends and risk factors in low back pain: an ergonomic perspective on prevention and management. Malaysian Journal of Ergonomics (MJEr). 2024; 6:105-18.

[45] Vijayakumar R, Choi JH. Emerging trends of ergonomic risk assessment in construction safety management: a scientometric visualization analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):1-16.

[46] Güvel ŞT. Forecasting slipform labor productivity in the construction of reinforced concrete chimneys. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2025; 16(1):1-13.

[47] Asih IA, Setiawan I, Hernadewita H, Hendra H. Effects of ergonomics intervention on work accidents in the construction sector and their effect on productivity. Jurnal Sistem Dan Manajemen Industri. 2022; 6(1):45-55.

[48] Hasanain B. The role of ergonomic and human factors in sustainable manufacturing: a review. Machines. 2024; 12(3):1-27.

[49] Lee G, Bae J, Jacobs JV, Lee S. Wearable heart rate sensing and critical power-based whole-body fatigue monitoring in the field. Applied Ergonomics. 2024; 121:104358.

[50] Pratiwi I, Kalyana VS. Ergonomic risk evaluation of manual material handling in brick production. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri. 2022; 21(1):113-24.

[51] Fernández MM, Radoš S, Matković K, Gröller ME, Delrieux C. Ergoexplorer: interactive ergonomic risk assessment from video collections. IEEE Transactions on visualization and Computer Graphics. 2022; 29(1):43-52.

[52] Abas NH. Investigation of the construction industry stakeholder's perceptions of work-health and safety risk-based scenarios associated with risks. Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2022; 10:1373-84.

[53] Lin X, Guo Z, Guo H, Zhou Y. Vision-based real-time posture tracking for multiple construction workers. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 2024; 38(4):04024023.

[54] Miranda-oliveira P, Branco M, Fernandes OJ, Santos-rocha R. Comparison of the accuracy of a free 3D camera system with the ariel performance system. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization. 2021; 9(6):670-7.

[55] Zhang Z, Zou J, Lu P, Hu J, Cai Y, Xiao C, et al. Analysis of lumbar spine loading during walking in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls: an OpenSim-based study. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2024; 12:1-13.

[56] Nail-ulloa I, Zabala M, Sesek R, Chen H, Schall JMC, Gallagher S. Estimating compressive and shear forces at L5-S1: exploring the effects of load weight, asymmetry, and height using optical and inertial motion capture systems. Sensors. 2024; 24(6):1-25.

[57] Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2018; 126(5):1763-8.

[58] Greene RL, Lu ML, Barim MS, Wang X, Hayden M, Hu YH, et al. Estimating trunk angle kinematics during lifting using a computationally efficient computer vision method. Human Factors. 2022; 64(3):482-98.