Low power and high speed 2:1 multiplexer designs using pass transistor logic
Tripti Dua1, Neha Singh1 and Renu Kumawat2
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering,Manipal University Jaipur, Dehmi Kalan, Off Jaipur-Ajmer expressway, Jaipur,Rajasthan, 303007,India1
Department of IoT and Intelligent Systems,Manipal University Jaipur, Dehmi Kalan, Off Jaipur-Ajmer expressway, Jaipur,Rajasthan, 303007,India2
Department of IoT and Intelligent Systems,Manipal University Jaipur, Dehmi Kalan, Off Jaipur-Ajmer expressway, Jaipur,Rajasthan, 303007,India2
Corresponding Author : Neha Singh
Recieved : 21-September-2024; Revised : 17-February-2026; Accepted : 19-February-2026
Abstract
The emergence of power-constrained applications demands high-speed and energy-efficient circuit designs. A multiplexer (MUX) is a fundamental building block in datapath design, bus systems, and memory access, enabling data selection, signal routing, and arithmetic operations in very-large-scale integration (VLSI) systems where signal selection is required. This research paper proposes two 2:1 MUX designs based on pass transistor logic (PTL). The proposed designs aim to minimize switching activity, parasitic capacitances, and leakage currents, thereby enhancing overall performance and power efficiency. A comparative analysis with existing complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS)-based designs is performed using Hewlett-Packard Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (HSPICE). The simulation results demonstrate improvements in delay, power consumption, and energy efficiency across various supply voltages (VDD) through the evaluation of key performance metrics for the proposed designs.
Keywords
Pass transistor logic (PTL), Multiplexer (MUX), Very-large-scale integration (VLSI), Low power design, Energy efficiency, HSPICE simulation.
Cite this article
Dua T, Singh N, Kumawat R. Low power and high speed 2:1 multiplexer designs using pass transistor logic. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2026;13(135):303-318. DOI : 10.19101/IJATEE.2024.111101724
References
[1]
Parashar I, Sikarwar P, Singh R, Chauhan S, Saxena S. Design and simulation of 4*1 MUX based on low power design techniques. SSRG International Journal of VLSI & Signal Processing. 2015; 2(1):17-21.
[2]
Novara RC, Djemai M. Design of a CMOS multiplexer with ultra low power using current mode logic technology. SSRG International Journal of VLSI & Signal Processing. 2016; 3(2):8-12.
[3]
Saha S, Jafar TB, Sarah ZZ, Mahbub L, Sultana S, Amin MT. Optimized multiplexer architectures: a hybrid approach to low-power and high-speed VL. International conference on quantum photonics, artificial intelligence, and networking (QPAIN) 2025 (pp.1-5). IEEE.
[4]
Agarwal S, Pathak N, Awadhiya B. Design and implementation of power efficient 8:1 multiplexer using PTL technology. In 2nd international conference on paradigm shifts in communications embedded systems, machine learning and signal processing (PCEMS) 2023 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[5]
Bansal M, Bharti V, Chander V. Comparison between conventional fast multipliers and improved fast multipliers using PTL logic. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering 2021 (pp. 1-12). IOP Publishing.
[6]
Paldurai K, Deepesh M, Prasanna KK, Kishore C, Deepak K. Optimizing multiplier performance with advanced PTL-based AND gate and efficient full adder design. In international conference on smart systems for electrical, electronics, communication and computer engineering (ICSSEECC) 2024 (pp. 295-300). IEEE.
[7]
Rai L, Kumar P, Gupta N, Gupta R. Performance analysis of low power multiplexer for communication system. In devices for integrated circuit (DevIC) 2023 (pp. 17-21). IEEE.
[8]
Vadithe VB, Manyam HR, Golla R. A PTL based power efficient ALU block using 45nm technology. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. 2021; 25(5):5844-52.
[9]
Bommi RM. Design and implementation of carry look-ahead adder using PTL with comparative analysis against transmission gate logic. In 3rd international conference on communication, security, and artificial intelligence (ICCSAI) 2025 (pp. 38-43). IEEE.
[10]
Justin J, Vijayasri P. Low-power digital circuit design: evaluating pass-transistor logic and CMOS for power-delay optimization. In 8th international conference on circuit, power & computing technologies (ICCPCT) 2025 (pp. 1111-8). IEEE.
[11]
Abirami S, Kumar MA, Abinaya E, Sowmaya J. Design and analysis of 2:1 multiplexer circuit for high performance. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 2015; 7(1):183-6.
[12]
Kumar N, Mittal P. Performance investigation of 2:1 multiplexer using 90nm technology node for low power application. In international conference on electrical and electronics engineering (ICE3) 2020 (pp. 616-9). IEEE.
[13]
Anugraha RV, Durga DS, Avudaiammam R. Design and performance analysis of 2:1 multiplexer using multiple logic families at 180 nm technology. In 2nd international conference on recent trends in electronics, information & communication technology (RTEICT) 2017 (pp. 1849-53). IEEE.
[14]
Vyas M, Akashe S. Performance augmentation of 2:1 MUX using transmission gate. In proceedings of the second international conference on information and communication technology for competitive strategies 2016 (pp. 1-5). ACM.
[15]
Tiwari P, Kumar A. 2: 1 MUX design using multitudinous logic families at 45nm technology. In 2nd global conference for advancement in technology (GCAT) 2021 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
[16]
Singh V, Singh M, Arora T, Kaushik A, Saxena P. Design of 2:1 multiplexer using two phase drive adiabatic dynamic CMOS logic for low power applications. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. 2013; 3(1):1582-90.
[17]
Deepika G, Krishna PR, Rao KS. A sub threshold source coupled logic based design of low power CMOS analog multiplexer. International Journal of VLSI Design & Communication Systems. 2014; 5(5):45-57.
[18]
Sharma M, Pandey D, Palta P, Pandey BK. Design and power dissipation consideration of PFAL CMOS V/S conventional CMOS based 2:1 multiplexer and full adder. Silicon. 2022; 14(8):4401-10.
[19]
Kiran NS, Kumar S. Performance evaluation of adiabatic logic-based multiplexer and full adder circuits for ultra-low power applications. In first international conference on electronics, communication and signal processing (ICECSP) 2024 (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
[20]
Mehra M, Singh RP. 2:1 multiplexers using various styles of design. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 2018; 5(9):239-44.
[21]
Borhan MN. Design of the high speed and reliable source coupled logic multiplexer. Journal of VLSI Circuits and Systems. 2019; 1(1):18-22.
[22]
Niveditha M, Latha HKE. Implementation and comparative analysis of 2x1 multiplexers using different dynamic logic techniques. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2022; 9(5):2126-32.
[23]
Mahmod J, Hicks M. SRAM imprinting for system protection and differentiation. In proceedings of the 19th ACM Asia conference on computer and communications security 2024 (pp. 453-66). ACM.
[24]
Shukla S, Parmar O, Rajput AS, Mishra Z. Design and analysis of a multiplexer using domino CMOS logic. In international conference on robotics, control, automation and artificial intelligence 2022 (pp. 691-703). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[25]
Gupta A, Singh MK, Jaiswal R, Goel D, Singh K. Standard cell library design of 2:1 MUX using 45nm technology. In international conference on next generation electronics (NEleX) 2023 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[26]
Sivasakthi M, Radhika P. A high-speed MCML logic gate and multiplexer design in 45 nm CMOS technology. In fourth international conference on emerging research in electronics, computer science and technology (ICERECT) 2022 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[27]
Sooriamala AP, Solomi V, Korah R, Thomas AK. Design of multiplexers using reversible logic technique. International journal on recent and innovation trends in computing and communication. 2026; 11(9):62-8.
[28]
Singh P, Sharma U. Exploring low-power implementation techniques for 2: 1 MUX using conventional and CNTFET technology: a performance comparison. In 14th international conference on computing communication and networking technologies (ICCCNT) 2023 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.