(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-11 Issue-113 April-2024
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Assessing seismic soil liquefaction susceptibility and hazard zonation in Bihar, India: a comparative study of deterministic methods
Author Name : Ishwar Chandra Thakur and Lal Bahadur Roy
Abstract :

Bihar is a heavily populated state in India. It is experiencing a rapid increase in construction activities due to industrial expansion. The state is known for its high seismic activity, having experienced several earthquakes in the past, including the devastating 1934 earthquake and the most recent in 2015. The alluvial deposits in the Indo-Gangetic plain of Bihar caused substantial seismic soil liquefaction. Overpopulation and poor construction techniques have caused extensive damage to property and life. This study aims to provide an assessment of the seismic soil liquefaction susceptibility of Bihar with varying earthquake magnitudes (Mw) of 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, and 7.5. In the present study, two deterministic methods given by Tokimatsu and Yoshimi (1983) and IS 1893 (Part 1): (2016) have been used, and their results have been compared. Also, the study intends to produce a hazard zonation map of Bihar. The study shows that the liquefaction susceptibility of soil is significantly influenced by the depth of soil below ground level, Mw, standard penetration test (SPT) N-value, and fines content (FC). The hazard zonation maps reveal a high vulnerability of northern districts like Sitamarhi, Madhubani, and Supaul at Mw = 6.0. At Mw = 7.5, almost the entire state is prone to soil liquefaction. This emphasizes the importance of investigation and highlights the need for careful engineering practices to mitigate liquefaction hazards in Bihar.

Keywords : Standard penetration test blow count, Fines content, Hazard zonation map, Vulnerability, Liquefaction.
Cite this article : Thakur IC, Roy LB. Assessing seismic soil liquefaction susceptibility and hazard zonation in Bihar, India: a comparative study of deterministic methods. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2024; 11(113):459-484. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2023.10102111.
References :
[1]https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/atlas. Accessed 8 January 2024.
[2]http://bsdma.org/Welcome_note.aspx. Accessed 8 January 2024.
[3]Singh SK, Pandey AC. Geomorphology and the controls of geohydrology on waterlogging in Gangetic Plains, North Bihar, India. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2014; 71:1561-79.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Standard I. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, Part. 1893.
[Google Scholar]
[5]Rajendran CP, John B, Rajendran K, Sanwal J. Liquefaction record of the great 1934 earthquake predecessors from the north Bihar alluvial plains of India. Journal of Seismology. 2016; 20:733-45.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Banerji S, Roy S, Wadia D, West W, Normand C, Banerji A, et al. The north Bihar earthquake, 1934. Current Science. 1935; 3(8):372-5.
[Google Scholar]
[7]Jain SK. Earthquake engineering: problems and prospects. Indian Concrete Journal. 1994; 68(11):605-6.
[Google Scholar]
[8]Jain SK. Earthquake safety in India: achievements, challenges and opportunities. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2016; 14:1337-436.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Gupta HK. Major and great earthquakes in the Himalayan region: an overview. Earthquake Hazard and Seismic Risk Reduction. 2000:79-85.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Sukhija BS, Rao MN, Reddy DV, Nagabhushanam P, Kumar D, Lakshmi BV, et al. Palaeoliquefaction evidence of prehistoric large/great earthquakes in north Bihar, India. Current Science. 2002:1019-25.
[Google Scholar]
[11]Singh CS, Anima K, Kumar B, Gautam E, Kumari EA. Environmental challenge due to climate change in Bihar, developing state of India. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 2014; 4(13):21-8.
[Google Scholar]
[12]Raghucharan MC, Somala SN. Seismic damage and loss estimation for central Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Natural Hazards. 2018; 94:883-904.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Burnwal ML, Burman A, Samui P, Maity D. Deterministic strong ground motion study for the Sitamarhi area near Bihar–Nepal region. Natural Hazards. 2017; 87:237-54.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Burman A, Gautam R, Maity D. DSHA based estimation of peak ground acceleration for Madhubani and Supaul districts near Bihar–Nepal Region. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 2020; 38:1255-75.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]Shams R, Agrawal M, Gupta RK. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Kishanganj, Bihar, India. Journal of Earth System Science. 2022; 131(4):257.
[Google Scholar]
[16]Dey S. A devastating disaster: a case study of Nepal earthquake and its impact on human beings. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2015; 20:28-34.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Rai DC, Singhal V, Raj SB, Sagar SL. Reconnaissance of the effects of the M7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake of April 25, 2015. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. 2016; 7(1):1-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Sinha AK. Seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings of Patna by rapid visual screening. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(86):61-71.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Sinha AK. Rapid visual screening vulnerability assessment method of buildings: a review. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(88):326-36.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Jain SK. Indian earthquakes: an overview. Indian Concrete Journal. 1998; 72:555-62.
[Google Scholar]
[21]Jain SK, Agrawal AK, Tripathi RP. Geotechnical damage due to Bihar earthquake of august 1988. In 2nd international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics 1991 (pp. 1-7). University of Missouri—Rolla.
[Google Scholar]
[22]Marcussen E. Town planning after the 1934 Bihar-Nepal Earthquake: earthquake-safety, colonial improvements and the restructuring of urban space in Bihar. Studies in Nepali History and Society. 2017; 22(2):321-54.
[Google Scholar]
[23]Ranjith A, Kiran BM, Sanjith J, CL MK, Shwetha KG. Performance based seismic analysis of RC structural system under earthquake excitation. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(91):735-58.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Usman F, Murakami K, Kurniawan EB. Disaster mitigation preparedness of Semeru volcano eruption. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2023; 10(108):1524-36.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Tang XW, Hu JL, Qiu JN. Identifying significant influence factors of seismic soil liquefaction and analyzing their structural relationship. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2016; 20:2655-63.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]Hu J, Tan Y, Zou W. Key factors influencing earthquake-induced liquefaction and their direct and mediation effects. Plos One. 2021; 16(2):e0246387.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Konstantaras A, Petrakis NS, Frantzeskakis T, Markoulakis E, Kabassi K, Vardiambasis IO, et al. Deep learning neural network seismic big-data analysis of earthquake correlations in distinct seismic regions. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2021; 8(84):1410-23.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Reshma TV, Patnaikuni CK, Manjunatha M, Bharath A, Tangadagi RB. Influence of alccofine and polypropylene fibers on stabilization of soil–an investigational study. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(89):551-62.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Thakur IC, Roy LB. Soil liquefaction potential in different seismic zones of Bihar, India. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 2022; 12(6):9471-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Gautam D, De MFS, Fabbrocino G. Soil liquefaction in Kathmandu valley due to 25 April 2015 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2017; 97:37-47.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]Saxena S, Roy LB, Gupta PK, Kumar V, Paramasivam P. Model tests on ordinary and geosynthetic encased stone columns with recycled aggregates as filler material. International Journal of Geo-Engineering. 2024; 15(1):1-3.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[32]Saxena S, Roy LB. The effect of geometric parameters on the strength of stone columns. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 2022; 12(4):9028-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Saxena S, Roy LB. Suitability analysis of stone column materials with PLAXIS. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research. 2022; 12(2):8421-5.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[34]Cetin KO, Seed RB, Der KA, Tokimatsu K, Harder JLF, Kayen RE, et al. Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2004; 130(12):1314-40.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Tokimatsu K, Yoshimi Y. Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on SPT N-value and fines content. Soils and Foundations. 1983; 23(4):56-74.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Seed HB, Idriss IM. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. 1971; 97(9):1249-73.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[37]Youd TL, Idriss IM. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2001; 127(4):297-313.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Putti SP, Satyam N. Ground response analysis and liquefaction hazard assessment for Vishakhapatnam city. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. 2018; 3:1-4.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[39]Chanda S, Kumar M, Kumar N, Shukla RP. Study of liquefaction potential at Jaigarh port using standard penetration test data and consequences: a case study. In symposium in earthquake engineering 2022 (pp. 171-83). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[40]Poddar P, Ojha S, Gupta MK. Probabilistic and deterministic-based approach for liquefaction potential assessment of layered soil. Natural Hazards. 2023; 118(2):993-1012.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[41]Ghani S, Kumari S. Liquefaction susceptibility of high seismic region of Bihar considering fine content. In basics of computational geophysics 2021 (pp. 105-20). Elsevier.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[42]Mittal RK, Mahalakshmi N, Singh S. Evaluation of liquefaction screening criterion based on standard penetration test values. In structures congress 2013: bridging your passion with your profession 2013 (pp. 2983-8). ASCE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Satyam DN, Rao KS. Liquefaction hazard assessment using SPT and VS for two cities in India. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 2014; 44:468-79.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee SP, Das B. Prediction of liquefaction potential for Kolkata region by semi-empirical method. In 5th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics 2010 (pp. 1-8). Missouri University of Science and Technology.
[Google Scholar]
[45]Andrus RD, Stokoe IIKH. Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2000; 126(11):1015-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[46]Gurung L, Chatterjee K. Evaluation of liquefaction potential of Kolkata City, India: a deterministic approach. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 2023; 180(1):439-74.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[47]Boulanger RW, Idriss IM. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Report No. UCD/CGM.-14. 2014; 1:134.
[Google Scholar]
[48]Kumar S, Muley P, Syed NM. Soil liquefaction potential of Kalyani region, India. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 2023; 53(1):139-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[49]Naik SP, Patra NR. Generation of liquefaction potential map for Kanpur city and Allahabad city of northern India: an attempt for liquefaction hazard assessment. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 2018; 36:293-305.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[50]Muley P, Maheshwari BK, Paul DK. Liquefaction potential of Roorkee region using field and laboratory tests. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 2015; 1:1-3.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[51]Bolton SH, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM. Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 1985; 111(12):1425-45.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[52]Bardet JP, Ichii K, Lin CH. EERA: a computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits. University of Southern California, Department of Civil Engineering; 2000.
[Google Scholar]
[53]Muley P, Maheshwari BK, Kirar B. Liquefaction potential of sites in Roorkee region using SPT-based methods. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 2022; 8(2):26.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[54]Dwivedi VK, Dubey RK, Thockhom S, Pancholi V, Chopra S, Rastogi BK. Assessment of liquefaction potential of soil in Ahmedabad Region, Western India. The Journal of Indian Geophysical Union. 2017; 21(2):116-23.
[Google Scholar]
[55]Jha S, Roshan AD, Pisharady AS, Bishnoi LR. A review of state of art for SPT based liquefaction hazard assessment. Conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology 2017 (pp.1-10).
[Google Scholar]
[56]Hore R, Chakraborty S, Arefin MR, Ansary MA. CPT & SPT tests in assessing liquefaction potential. Geotechnical Engineering (00465828). 2020; 51(4).
[Google Scholar]
[57]Patriaman F, Fathani TF, Wilopo W. Liquefaction potential analysis in Palu Bay area. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science 2021 (pp. 1-12). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[58]Wadi D, Wu W, Malik I, Ahmed HA, Makki A. Assessment of liquefaction potential of soil based on standard penetration test for the upper Benue region in Nigeria. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2021; 80:1-11.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[59]Nilay N, Chakrabortty P, Popescu R. Liquefaction hazard mapping using various types of field test data. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 2022; 52(2):280-300.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[60]Ansari A, Zahoor F, Rao KS, Jain AK. Liquefaction hazard assessment in a seismically active region of Himalayas using geotechnical and geophysical investigations: a case study of the Jammu Region. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 2022; 81(9):1-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[61]Ortiz-hernández E, Chunga K, Pastor JL, Toulkeridis T. Assessing susceptibility to soil liquefaction using the standard penetration test (SPT)—a case study from the city of Portoviejo, Coastal Ecuador. Land. 2022; 11(4):1-20.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[62]Deviprasad BS, Chaitanya CK, Mazumder T, Vijaya R, Raja PS, Neeraj P, et al. Deterministic and probabilistic measures of liquefaction susceptibility: a comparison. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 2023; 53(1):208-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[63]Standard B. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part. 2005.
[Google Scholar]
[64]Shekhar S, Ram S, Burman A. Probabilistic analysis of piping in Habdat earthen embankment using monte carlo and subset simulation: a case study. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 2022; 52(4):907-26.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[65]Acharya IP, Subedi M, KC R. Liquefaction hazard assessment of Kathmandu valley using deterministic and probabilistic approaches. In Geo-Risk 2023 (pp. 307-17). ASCE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[66]Aytaş Z, Alpaslan N, Özçep F. Evaluation of liquefaction potential by standard penetration test and shear wave velocity methods: a case study. Natural Hazards. 2023; 118(3):2377-417.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[67]Kundu P, Pain A, Das J. Earthquake-induced liquefaction potential and risk assessment of the world’s largest mobile manufacturing plant, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2024; 83(7):194.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[68]Hwang JH, Yang CW. Appraisal of SPT-N methods in liquefaction analysis by using the Chi-Chi earthquake data cases. Sino Geotech. 2003; 98:79-90.
[Google Scholar]
[69]Chang M, Kuo CP, Shau SH, Hsu RE. Comparison of SPT-N-based analysis methods in evaluation of liquefaction potential during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Computers and Geotechnics. 2011; 38(3):393-406.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[70]Subası DE, Ikizler SB. Assessment of liquefaction potential of Erzincan province and its vicinity, Turkey. Natural Hazards. 2014; 73:1863-87.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[71]Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F. Soil liquefaction potential evaluation with use of the simplified procedure. In 1st international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics 1981 (pp. 1-7). University of Missouri—Rolla.
[Google Scholar]
[72]Rahman MA, Ahmed S, Imam MO. Rational way of estimating liquefaction severity: an implication for Chattogram, the Port city of Bangladesh. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 2020; 38(2):2359-75.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[73]Hossain MB, Roknuzzaman M, Rahman MM. Liquefaction potential evaluation by deterministic and probabilistic approaches. Civil Engineering Journal. 2022; 8(7):1459-81.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[74]Mhaske SY, Choudhury D. GIS-based soil liquefaction susceptibility map of Mumbai city for earthquake events. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2010; 70(3):216-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[75]Anbazhagan P, Basavaraj S, Premalatha KV. Liquefaction hazard mapping of Chennai, India using SPT data. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering. 2011; 4(2):223-32.
[Google Scholar]
[76]Ganapathy GP, Zaalishvili VB, Melkov DA, Dzeranov BV, Chandrasekaran SS. Mapping of soil liquefaction potential susceptibility for urban areas. Geology and Geophysics of the South of Russia. 2018(3):106-15.
[Google Scholar]
[77]Das S, Ghosh S, Kayal JR. Liquefaction potential of Agartala city in Northeast India using a GIS platform. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 2019; 78:2919-31.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[78]Bhatt N, Pancholi V, Chopra S, Rout MM, Shah RD, Kothyari GC. Rapid seismic hazard assessment of the Sabarmati river basin in Gujarat state, western India using GIS techniques. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 2019; 78:3927-42.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[79]Satyanarayana RCN, Harika A. Study on liquefaction evaluation of subsoil strata along Visakhapatnam coastal area. In Indian geotechnical conference 2021 (pp. 241-57). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[80]Boumpoulis V, Depountis N, Pelekis P, Sabatakakis N. SPT and CPT application for liquefaction evaluation in Greece. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2021; 14:1-5.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[81]Rawat A, Kumar D, Chatterjee RS, Kumar H. A GIS-based liquefaction susceptibility mapping utilising the morphotectonic analysis to highlight potential hazard zones in the East Ganga plain. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2022; 81(13):358.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[82]Pancholi V, Bhatt N, Singh P, Chopra S. Multi-criteria approach using GIS for macro-level seismic hazard assessment of Kachchh rift basin, Gujarat, western India–first step towards earthquake disaster mitigation. Journal of Earth System Science. 2022; 131(1):3.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[83]Ashikuzzaman M, Hossain A, Salan MS. Liquefaction assessment of Rajshahi city corporation, Bangladesh. Indian Geotechnical Journal. 2023; 53(2):455-64.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[84]Seed HB, Idriss IM. Analysis of soil liquefaction: Niigata earthquake. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. 1967; 93(3):83-108.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[85]De APA, Chan CK, Seed HB. Sand liquefaction in large-scale simple shear tests. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. 1976; 102(9):909-27.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]