(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-9 Issue-86 January-2022
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : CFD analysis of Gypsum crystallization fouling in 2D plate heat exchangers
Author Name : Amit Kumar, Sandeep Yadav, Dilbag Singh Mondloe, Vinayak Barewar, Yogender Kumar and Vinay Pandit
Abstract :

The deposition of material present in the flowing fluids onto the surfaces of various internal parts of heat exchangers is the main reason for thermal efficiency reduction. This phenomenon of deposition is known as fouling. The fouling phenomenon could be understood prominently by experimental and numerical investigations. In the current work, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used to develop numerical models to simulate the crystallization fouling, and a correlation of an optimum operating conditions for minimum fouling effect has been achieved. The development of numerical models required many stages, and these stages involved a critical evaluation of all the processes in crystallization fouling. In the first stage, the numerical solutions for the crystallization flux are validated with corresponding experimental fouling resistance distributions. The validation provides an insight into factors determining the likelihood of the fouling mechanisms. Then, the impact of deposit growth on fouling is determined by calculating the fouling resistance and monitoring its temporal variation. Afterward, the numerical values of the fouling rate are calculated from the resulting fouling curves. The simulation results show that fouling includes both time and space dependency. Also, the fouling thickness increases up to 1.4 mm in approximately 200hrs time passage for a given heat flux of 54 kW/m2 and concentration of 2.42 g/l at different inlet velocities. Similarly, the fouling resistance increases up to 0.003 K.m2 /W under the same operating conditions. Almost the same trends have been obtained at the same inlet velocity of 0.2 m/s and different heat transfer rates. In the context of space dependencies of fouling phenomenon, the mass deposition rate of fouling increases from 0.005gm/m2 s to 0.035 gm/m2 s along the length of the plate from 380 mm to 600 mm at a given heat flux of 54 kW/m2 and concentration of 2.42 g/l at different inlet velocity. And, hence the correlation of an optimum operating condition of minimum fouling effect was achieved for a two dimensional (2D) plate heat exchanger. The results obtained from the CFD simulation indicate that multiple factors affect the fouling phenomenon including fouling thickness, fouling resistance, heat transfer coefficient, velocity, heat flux input, and so on at the local level. Further, the fouling phenomenon of heat exchangers has been accessed with the help of various related innovative ideas of modeling in CFD. The research objectives of predicting the fouling behavior using CFD simulation have been achieved, and various exciting results have been found.

Keywords : Computational fluid dynamics, Crystallization fouling, Plate heat exchanger.
Cite this article : Kumar A, Yadav S, Mondloe DS, Barewar V, Kumar Y, Pandit V. CFD analysis of Gypsum crystallization fouling in 2D plate heat exchangers. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(86):28-46. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2021.874616.
References :
[1]Taborek J. Fouling: the major unsolved problem in heat transfer. Chemical Engineering Progress. 1972; 68:59-67.
[Google Scholar]
[2]Mukherjee R. Conquer heat exchanger fouling. Hydrocarbon Processing. 1996; 75(1).
[Google Scholar]
[3]Karabelas AJ. Scale formation in tubular heat exchangers-research priorities. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2002; 41(7):682-92.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Brahim F, Augustin W, Bohnet M. Numerical simulation of the fouling process. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2003; 42(3):323-34.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]Khan MS, Budair MO, Zubair SM. A parametric study of CaCO3 scaling in AISI 316 stainless steel tubes. Heat and Mass Transfer. 2001; 38(1):115-21.
[Google Scholar]
[6]Langelier WF, Caldwell DH, Lawrence WB, Spaulding CH. Scale control in sea water distillation equipment-contact stabilization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry. 1950; 42(1):126-30.
[Google Scholar]
[7]Xu Z, Han Z, Wang J, Li Y. Numerical simulation of CaSO4 crystallization fouling in a rectangular channel with vortex generators. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2019; 101:42-50.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Lv Y, Lu K, Ren Y. Composite crystallization fouling characteristics of normal solubility salt in double-pipe heat exchanger. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Kern D. A theoretical analysis of thermal surface fouling. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 1959; 4:258-62.
[Google Scholar]
[10]Bornstein L. Numerical data and functional relationships in science and technology. Magnetic and Another Properties of Oxides and Related Compounds. Pt. A Garnets and Perovscites. 1978.
[Google Scholar]
[11]Bott TR. Fouling of heat exchangers. Elsevier; 1995.
[Google Scholar]
[12]Mullin JW. Crystallization. 2nd Edition. Crystal Research and Technology Butterworths, London, 1972
[13]Müller-Steinhagen H, Zhao Q. Investigation of low fouling surface alloys made by ion implantation technology. Chemical Engineering Science. 1997; 52(19):3321-32.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Watkinson AP, Wilson DI. Chemical reaction fouling: a review. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 1997; 14(4):361-74.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]Hasson D. Precipitation fouling: fouling of heat transfer equipment. Invited Paper, Haifa. 1981:527-68.
[Google Scholar]
[16]Bohnet M. Fouling of heat transfer surfaces. Chemical Engineering & Technology. 1987; 10(1):113-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Song KS, Lim J, Yun S, Kim D, Kim Y. Composite fouling characteristics of CaCO3 and CaSO4 in plate heat exchangers at various operating and geometric conditions. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2019; 136:555-62.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Al-ahmad M, Aleem FA. Scale formation and fouling problems and their predicted reflection on the performance of desalination plants in Saudi Arabia. Desalination. 1994; 96(1-3):409-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Ma Q, Tipping RH, Boulet C. Irreducible correlation functions of the S ̂ matrix in the coordinate representation: application in calculating Lorentzian half-widths and shifts. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2006; 124(1).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Isogai S, Nakamura M, Inokuchi H, Kimura H, Koga Y. Measurement and modeling for the mitigation of organic crystallization fouling. Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning: Fundamentals and Applications. 2003.
[Google Scholar]
[21]Reitzer BJ. Rate of scale formation in tubular heat exchangers, mathematical analysis of factors influencing rate of decline of over-all heat transfer coefficients. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development. 1964; 3(4):345-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Inokuchi H, Nakamura M, Koga Y. Study of an organic crystallization fouling problem. Proceedings of 7th international conference on heat exchanger fouling and cleaning - challenges and opportunities. 2007 (pp.172-4).
[Google Scholar]
[23]Pääkkönen TM, Riihimäki M, Simonson CJ, Muurinen E, Keiski RL. Modeling CaCO3 crystallization fouling on a heat exchanger surface–definition of fouling layer properties and model parameters. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2015; 83:84-98.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Pääkkönen TM, Riihimäki M, Simonson CJ, Muurinen E, Keiski RL. Crystallization fouling of CaCO3–analysis of experimental thermal resistance and its uncertainty. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2012; 55(23-24):6927-37.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Epstein N. Thinking about heat transfer fouling: a 5× 5 matrix. Heat Transfer Engineering. 1983; 4(1):43-56.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]Pääkkönen TM, Ojaniemi U, Pättikangas T, Manninen M, Muurinen E, Keiski RL, et al. CFD modelling of CaCO3 crystallization fouling on heat transfer surfaces. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2016; 97:618-30.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Nikoo AH, Malayeri MR, Al-janabi A. Fouling propensity of modified heat transfer surfaces. Heat Transfer Engineering. 2020; 41(11):919-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Sundar S, Rajagopal MC, Zhao H, Kuntumalla G, Meng Y, Chang HC, et al. Fouling modeling and prediction approach for heat exchangers using deep learning. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Dong L, Crittenden BD, Yang M. Fouling characteristics of water-CaSO4 solution under surface crystallization and bulk precipitation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Xu Z, Zhao Y, Han Z, Wang J. Numerical simulation of calcium sulfate (CaSO 4) fouling in the plate heat exchanger. Heat and Mass Transfer. 2018; 54(7):1867-77.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]Schlüter F, Augustin W, Scholl S. Application of experimental data to model local fouling resistances. Heat and Mass Transfer. 2022; 58(1):29-40.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]