(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)
Navigation

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-9 Issue-90 May-2022
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Prediction of neurodegenerative disease using brain image analysis with multilinear principal component analysis and quadratic discriminant analysis
Author Name : Arunraj Gopalsamy, B. Radha and K. Haridas
Abstract :

Neuroimaging, a part of medical imaging is playing a crucial role in the field of neuroscience and psychology for analysing the structure as well as functions of the internal nervous system. It is the most evolving and prominent method in medical science as it not only focuses on the structure, but also the functional aspects of the brain. It helps in diagnosing metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. More precisely, magnetic resonance imaging is one of the cutting-edge technologies in the medical verdict for the past four decades in diagnosing Neuro disorders. In recent years, machine learning and other high-end reckoning tools are used universally in assisting the automated identification of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and so on. However, similarities exist in the functional part of the nervous system, making it difficult for the learning algorithms to classify the disease. The main goal of this article is to predict neurodegenerative diseases in an effective way using functional analysis of brain images. The proposed model for predicting neurodegenerative diseases based on brain image analysis has two main phases. The first phase processes the image by applying pre-processing techniques and extracts the features from the images using wavelet transform and histogram gradients for further processing. The second phase applies machine learning algorithms such as multilinear principal component analysis and regularized discriminant analysis for selecting the features and identifying the prediction labels respectively. The experimental analysis has been performed with various brain image datasets such as DS-66, DS-75, DS-160 and DS-255. The obtained results show the 100% accuracy on DS-66, DS-75, and DS-160 datasets and 99.58% accuracy on DS-255 and take a minimum computational overhead of 0.025s. Thus, the proposed model offers improved results than many other existing models. Also, the performance analysis using various quality metrics endorses the significance of the proposed model in diagnosing neurodegenerative disease.
Keywords : Neurodegenerative disease prediction, Wavelet transforms, Histogram-oriented gradients, Multilinear principal component analysis, Regularized discriminant analysis, Brain MR images.
Cite this article : Gopalsamy A, Radha B, Haridas K. Prediction of neurodegenerative disease using brain image analysis with multilinear principal component analysis and quadratic discriminant analysis . International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(90):604-622. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2021.875325.
References :
[1]https://www.physio-pedia.com/Neurodegenerative_Disease. 10 September 2021.
[2]Taylor JP, Brown RH, Cleveland DW. Decoding ALS: from genes to mechanism. Nature. 2016; 539(7628):197-206.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[3]Gitler AD, Dhillon P, Shorter J. Neurodegenerative disease: models, mechanisms, and a new hope. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2017; 10(5):499-502.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]https://www.wehi.edu.au/research-diseases/development-and-ageing/neurodegenerative-disorders. 10 September 2021.
[5]https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/health/neurodegenerative/index.cfm. 10 September 2021.
[6]Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR. The diagnostic process. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015.
[Google Scholar]
[7]Ahmed Z, Mohamed K, Zeeshan S, Dong X. Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine. Database. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Myszczynska MA, Ojamies PN, Lacoste A, Neil D, Saffari A, Mead R, et al. Applications of machine learning to diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2020; 16(8):440-56.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Saeed U, Compagnone J, Aviv RI, Strafella AP, Black SE Lang AE, et al. Imaging biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease and Parkinsonian syndromes: current and emerging concepts. Translational Neurodegeneration. 2017; 6(1):1-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Jha D, Kwon GR. Development of an efficient cascade pathological-brain detection system using a median filter and quadratic discriminant analysis. IEIE Transactions on Smart Processing and Computing. 2018; 7(2):140-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Maji P, Kundu MK, Chanda B. Second order fuzzy measure and weighted co-occurrence matrix for segmentation of brain MR images. Fundamenta Informaticae. 2008; 88(1-2):161-76.
[Google Scholar]
[12]Ain Q, Jaffar MA, Choi TS. Fuzzy anisotropic diffusion based segmentation and texture based ensemble classification of brain tumor. Applied Soft Computing. 2014; 21:330-40.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Wang H, Fei B. A modified fuzzy C-means classification method using a multiscale diffusion filtering scheme. Medical Image Analysis. 2009; 13(2):193-202.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Liu W, Liu J, Peng T, Wang G, Balas VE, Geman O, et al. Prediction of Parkinson’s disease based on artificial neural networks using speech datasets. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2022:1-4.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]Nagasubramanian G, Sankayya M. Multi-variate vocal data analysis for detection of Parkinson disease using deep learning. Neural Computing and Applications. 2021; 33(10):4849-64.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Shalin G, Pardoel S, Lemaire ED, Nantel J, Kofman J. Prediction and detection of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease from plantar pressure data using long short-term memory neural-networks. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. 2021; 18(1):1-15.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Noor MB, Zenia NZ, Kaiser MS, Mamun SA, Mahmud M. Application of deep learning in detecting neurological disorders from magnetic resonance images: a survey on the detection of Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia. Brain Informatics. 2020; 7(1):1-21.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhan T, Phillips P, Zhang YD, et al. Pathological brain detection by artificial intelligence in magnetic resonance imaging scanning (invited review). Progress in Electromagnetics Research. 2016; 156:105-33.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Jyotiyana M, Kesswani N. A study on deep learning in neurodegenerative diseases and other brain disorders. In rising threats in expert applications and solutions 2021 (pp. 791-9). Springer, Singapore.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Varuna SN, Kumar TN. Identification and classification of brain tumor MRI images with feature extraction using DWT and probabilistic neural network. Brain Informatics. 2018; 5(1):23-30.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[21]Khalil M, Ayad H, Adib A. Performance evaluation of feature extraction techniques in MR-Brain image classification system. Procedia Computer Science. 2018; 127:218-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Ayadi W, Elhamzi W, Charfi I, Atri M. A hybrid feature extraction approach for brain MRI classification based on Bag-of-words. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2019; 48:144-52.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[23]Huang GH, Lin CH, Cai YR, Chen TB, Hsu SY, Lu NH, Chen HY, Wu YC. Multiclass machine learning classification of functional brain images for Parkinsons disease stage prediction. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal. 2020; 13(5):508-23.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Jha D, Kim JI, Choi MR, Kwon GR. Pathological brain detection using weiner filtering, 2D-discrete wavelet transform, probabilistic PCA, and random subspace ensemble classifier. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2017.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Nayak DR, Dash R, Majhi B. Brain MR image classification using two-dimensional discrete wavelet transform and AdaBoost with random forests. Neurocomputing. 2016; 177:188-97.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[26]Chaplot S, Patnaik LM, Jagannathan NR. Classification of magnetic resonance brain images using wavelets as input to support vector machine and neural network. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2006; 1(1):86-92.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Zhou X, Wang S, Xu W, Ji G, Phillips P, Sun P, Zhang Y. Detection of pathological brain in MRI scanning based on wavelet-entropy and naive Bayes classifier. In international conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering 2015 (pp. 201-9). Springer, Cham.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]El-dahshan ES, Hosny T, Salem AB. Hybrid intelligent techniques for MRI brain images classification. Digital Signal Processing. 2010; 20(2):433-41.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Zhang YD, Wang S, Wu L. A novel method for magnetic resonance brain image classification based on adaptive chaotic PSO. Progress in Electromagnetics Research. 2010; 109:325-43.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Zhang YD, Wu L, Wang S. Magnetic resonance brain image classification by an improved artificial bee colony algorithm. Progress In Electromagnetics Research. 2011;116: 65-79.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]Zhang Y, Dong Z, Wu L, Wang S. A hybrid method for MRI brain image classification. Expert Systems with Applications. 2011; 38(8):10049-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[32]Zhang YD, Wu L. An MR brain images classifier via principal component analysis and kernel support vector machine. Progress in Electromagnetics Research. 2012; 130:369-88.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Nayak DR, Dash R, Majhi B. Least squares SVM approach for abnormal brain detection in MRI using multiresolution analysis. In international conference on computing, communication and security 2015 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[34]Das S, Chowdhury M, Kundu MK. Brain MR image classification using multiscale geometric analysis of ripplet. Progress in Electromagnetics Research. 2013; 137:1-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Devi S, Sahoo MN, Bakshi S. A novel privacy-supporting 2-class classification technique for brain MRI images. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering. 2020; 40(3):1022-35.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Saritha M, Joseph KP, Mathew AT. Classification of MRI brain images using combined wavelet entropy based spider web plots and probabilistic neural network. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2013; 34(16):2151-6.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[37]Zhang YD, Wang S, Dong Z, Phillip P, Ji G, Yang J. Pathological brain detection in magnetic resonance imaging scanning by wavelet entropy and hybridization of biogeography-based optimization and particle swarm optimization. Progress In Electromagnetics Research. 2015;152: 41-58.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Zhang Y, Dong Z, Wang S, Ji G, Yang J. Preclinical diagnosis of magnetic resonance (MR) brain images via discrete wavelet packet transform with Tsallis entropy and generalized eigenvalue proximal support vector machine. Entropy. 2015; 17(4):1795-813.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[39]Wang S, Lu S, Dong Z, Yang J, Yang M, Zhang Y. Dual-tree complex wavelet transform and twin support vector machine for pathological brain detection. Applied Sciences. 2016; 6(6).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[40]El-dahshan ES, Mohsen HM, Revett K, Salem AB. Computer-aided diagnosis of human brain tumor through MRI: a survey and a new algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications. 2014; 41(11):5526-45.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[41]Mozhdehfarahbakhsh A, Chitsazian S, Chakrabarti P, Chakrabarti T, Kateb B, Nami M. An MRI-based deep learning model to predict Parkinson disease stages. medRxiv. 2021.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[42]Berke Erdaş Ç, Sümer E, Kibaroğlu S. CNN-based severity prediction of neurodegenerative diseases using gait data. Digital Health. 2022; 1-14.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Wang S, Zhang Y, Dong Z, Du S, Ji G, Yan J, et al. Feed‐forward neural network optimized by hybridization of PSO and ABC for abnormal brain detection. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology. 2015; 25(2):153-64.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Zhang Y, Sun Y, Phillips P, Liu G, Zhou X, Wang S. A multilayer perceptron based smart pathological brain detection system by fractional Fourier entropy. Journal of Medical Systems. 2016; 40(7):1-11.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[45]Ranjan Nayak D, Dash R, Majhi B. Stationary wavelet transform and AdaBoost with SVM based pathological brain detection in MRI scanning. CNS & Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-CNS & Neurological Disorders). 2017; 16(2):137-49.
[Google Scholar]
[46]Vidyasaraswathi HN, Hanumantharaju MC. Review of various histogram based medical image enhancement techniques. In proceedings of the international conference on advanced research in computer science engineering & technology 2015 (pp. 1-6).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[47]Pandey A, Chandra R, Dutta MK, Burget R, Uher V, Minar J. Automatic detection of red lesions in diabetic retinopathy using shape based extraction technique in fundus image. In international conference on telecommunications and signal processing 2016 (pp. 538-42). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[48]Bäckström K, Nazari M, Gu IY, Jakola AS. An efficient 3D deep convolutional network for Alzheimers disease diagnosis using MR images. In 15th international symposium on biomedical imaging 2018 (pp. 149-53). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[49]Esmaeilzadeh S, Yang Y, Adeli E. End-to-end parkinson disease diagnosis using brain MR-images by 3d-CNN. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05233. 2018.
[Google Scholar]
[50]https://radiopaedia.org/cases/37605. Accessed on 7 October 2021.
[51]Herrera LJ, Rojas I, Pomares H, Guillén A, Valenzuela O, Baños O. Classification of MRI images for Alzheimers disease detection. In international conference on social computing 2013 (pp. 846-51). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[52]Wulandari P, Novitasari D, Asyhar A. Identification of Alzheimer’s disease in MRI data using discrete wavelet transform and support vector machine. In proceedings of the international conference on mathematics and Islam 2018 (pp. 198-204).
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[53]Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. London, UK: Pearson; 2014.
[Google Scholar]
[54]Lu H, Plataniotis KN, Venetsanopoulos AN. Multilinear principal component analysis of tensor objects for recognition. In international conference on pattern recognition 2006 (pp. 776-9). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[55]Vasilescu MA, Terzopoulos D. Multilinear subspace analysis of image ensembles. In computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2003 (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[56]Fu R, Han M, Tian Y, Shi P. Improvement motor imagery EEG classification based on sparse common spatial pattern and regularized discriminant analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2020.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[57]Lee CC, Huang SS, Shih CY. Facial affect recognition using regularized discriminant analysis-based algorithms. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing. 2010:1-10.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[58]Krasoulis A, Nazarpour K, Vijayakumar S. Use of regularized discriminant analysis improves myoelectric hand movement classification. In 8th international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering (NER) 2017 (pp. 395-8). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[59]Johnson KA. The whole brain atlas. 2012.
[Google Scholar]
[60]Bama SS, Ahmed MI, Saravanan A. A survey on performance evaluation measures for information retrieval system. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2015; 2(2):1015-20.
[Google Scholar]