(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-9 Issue-96 November-2022
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Energy efficient hybrid AOMDV-SSPSO protocol for improvement of MANET network lifetime
Author Name : Veepin Kumar and Sanjay Singla
Abstract :

Mobile adhoc network (MANET) contributes to a variety of applications due to its optimum design and capacity to be used in situations where establishing a physical network is not feasible. MANET consists of nodes that use routing protocols to send packets from source to sink using the store-and-forward technique. Data packet transit from source to sink is a relatively expensive procedure because these packets are delivered through each intermediate node. MANET has a number of issues, one of which being high energy consumption (EC). The wireless mobile nodes in MANET does not have a reliable power source as the nodes in this network are battery-powered. As a result, the network's lifespan is decreased by the quick battery depletion. However, when determining a path from a source to a sink node, traditional protocols also neglect the consumption of energy by the nodes. Therefore, to enhance the performance of MANET routing performance, we proposed an optimized routing protocol named as adhoc on-demand multipath distance vector sleep scheduling particle swarm optimization (AOMDV-SSPSO) which is based on the concept of Swarm intelligence (SI). SI approaches are based on the concept of optimization and provides the best solution in MANET to resolve computational challenges i.e., routing of data using these optimization techniques improves the route optimization and quality of services. The objective of the proposed research work is achieved by three vital steps which are route establishment phase, optimal path selection and sleep scheduling mechanism. The route establishment phase is based on an AOMDV routing protocol which can be used to identify multiple routes for data transfer from source to destination. Out of all the possible routes the optimal path will be selected with the help of particle swarm optimization (PSO). The sleep scheduling technique places nodes in a sleep state when they are not in use and their absence does not result in partition in their immediate area. The effectiveness of the suggested algorithm is examined and compared against the existing approaches in terms of end-to-end (E2E) delay, energy consumption (EC), network lifetime and throughput (TH). The simulation results generated by the network simulator (NS 2.35) software indicate the effectiveness of the proposed technique. According to the simulation results, AOMDV-SSPSO offers greater TH and is more energy efficient, resulting in a longer network lifespan. However, because of the nodes transition from one state to another, the E2E delay in AOMDV-SSPSO is high. In general, it is observed that the proposed technique AOMDV-SSPSO outperforms than other existing protocols.

Keywords : AOMDV, EC, Energy efficiency, E2E delay, MANET, Network lifetime, NS 2.35, PSO, Throughput.
Cite this article : Kumar V, Singla S. Energy efficient hybrid AOMDV-SSPSO protocol for improvement of MANET network lifetime . International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2022; 9(96):1642-1660. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2021.876041.
References :
[1]Jawandhiya PM, Ghonge D, Ali MS, Deshpande JS. A survey of mobile ad hoc network attacks. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 2010; 2(9):4063-71.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[2]Bang AO, Ramteke PL. MANET: history, challenges and applications. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management. 2013; 2(9):249-51.
[Google Scholar]
[3]Raju LR, Reddy C. A survey on routing protocols and QoS in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2017; 10(9):1-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Mishra A, Singh S, Tripathi AK. Comparison of MANET routing protocols. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing. 2019; 8(2):67-74.
[Google Scholar]
[5]Abdulleh MN, Yussof S, Jassim HS. Comparative study of proactive, reactive and geographical manet routing protocols. Communications and Network. 2015; 7(2):125-37.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[6]Bai Y, Mai Y, Wang N. Performance comparison and evaluation of the routing protocols for MANETs using NS3. Journal of Electrical Engineering. 2017:187-95.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]Ibrahim IS, King PJ, Pooley R. Performance evaluation of routing protocols for MANET. In fourth international conference on systems and networks communications 2009 (pp. 105-12). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Walunjkar GM, Anne KR. Performance analysis of routing protocols in MANET. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. 2020; 17(2):1047-52.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Rajeshkumar V, Sivakumar P. Comparative study of AODV, DSDV and DSR routing protocols in MANET using network simulator-2. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering. 2013; 2(12):4564-9.
[Google Scholar]
[10]Nandhini J, Sharmila D. Energy efficient routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks–a survey. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering. 2013; 3(3).
[Google Scholar]
[11]Bendale LM, Jain RL, Patil GD. Study of various routing protocols in mobile ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Scientific Research in Network Security and Communication. 2018; 6(1):5-15.
[Google Scholar]
[12]Alam M, Khan AH, Khan IR. Swarm intelligence in MANETS: a survey. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management &Technology. 2016; 5(5):141-50.
[Google Scholar]
[13]Murugan S, Jeyalaksshmi S, Mahalakshmi B, Suseendran G, Jabeen TN, Manikandan R. Comparison of ACO and PSO algorithm using energy consumption and load balancing in emerging MANET and VANET infrastructure. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2020; 7(9):1197-204.
[Google Scholar]
[14]Darwish A. Bio-inspired computing: algorithms review, deep analysis, and the scope of applications. Future Computing and Informatics Journal. 2018; 3(2):231-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[15]Agbaria A, Gershinsky G, Naaman N, Shagin K. Extrapolation-based and QoS-aware real-time communication in wireless mobile ad hoc networks. In 8th IFIP annual mediterranean ad hoc networking workshop 2009 (pp. 21-6). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Sivakumar P, Duraiswamy K. A QoS routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks based on the load distribution. In international conference on computational intelligence and computing research 2010 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Srivastava S, Daniel AK, Singh R, Saini JP. Energy-efficient position based routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. In international conference on radar, communication and computing 2012 (pp. 18-23). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Abd EAM, Ibrahim HM, Mohamed MH, Hedar AR. Ant colony and load balancing optimizations for AODV routing protocol. International Journal of Sensor Networks and Data Communications. 2012; 1:1-14.
[Google Scholar]
[19]Azzuhri SR, Mhd NMB, Jamaludin J, Ahmedy I, Md NR. Towards a better approach for link breaks detection and route repairs strategy in AODV protocol. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2018.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Gautam J, Fathima BL, Sangeetha KS, Muzammil PM. Energy resource optimization in wireless ad-hoc network using dynamic states. Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology. 2016; 13(II):57-61.
[Google Scholar]
[21]Alinci M, Inaba T, Elmazi D, Spaho E, Kolici V, Barolli L. Improving node security in MANET clusters: a comparison study of two fuzzy-based systems. In 19th international conference on network-based information systems 2016 (pp. 355-63). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Priyadharshini C, Selvan D. PSO based dynamic route recovery protocol for predicting route lifetime and maximizing network lifetime in MANET. In technological innovations in ICT for agriculture and rural development 2016 (pp. 97-104). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[23]Bhardwaj M. Enhance life time of mobile ad-hoc network using WiTriCity and backpressure technique. Procedia Computer Science. 2015; 57:1342-50.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Saxena M, Phate N, Mathai KJ, Rizvi MA. Clustering based energy efficient algorithm using max-heap tree for MANET. In 2014 fourth international conference on communication systems and network technologies 2014 (pp. 123-7). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Singh A, Chadha D. A study on energy efficient routing protocols in MANETs with effect on selfish behaviour. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering. 2013; 1(7):1386-400.
[Google Scholar]
[26]Mohammed AS, Basha S, Asha PN, Venkatachalam K. FCO-fuzzy constraints applied cluster optimization technique for wireless ad hoc networks. Computer Communications. 2020; 154:501-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Joshi SS, Biradar SR. Communication framework for jointly addressing issues of routing overhead and energy drainage in MANET. Procedia Computer Science. 2016; 89:57-63.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Shashidhara DN, Chandrappa DN, Puttamadappa C. A novel location aware content prefetching technique for mobile adhoc network. Procedia Computer Science. 2020; 171:1970-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Tabatabaei S. A new routing protocol for energy optimization in mobile ad hoc networks using the cuckoo optimization and the TOPSIS multi-criteria algorithm. Cybernetics and Systems. 2021; 52(6):477-97.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Sarhan S, Sarhan S. Elephant herding optimization ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing protocol for MANET. IEEE Access. 2021; 9:39489-99.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]Kumaran NS, Ramasamy A. Energy efficient multiconstrained optimization using hybrid ACO and GA in MANET routing. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2016; 24(5):3698-713.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[32]Li J, Wang M, Zhu P, Wang D, You X. Highly reliable fuzzy-logic-assisted AODV routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks. Sensors. 2021; 21(17):1-15.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Jubair MA, Khaleefah SH, Budiyono A, Mostafa SA, Mustapha A. Performance evaluation of AODV and OLSR routing protocols in MANET environment. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. 2018; 8(4):1277-83.
[Google Scholar]
[34]Venkatasubramanian S. Fruit-Fly algorithm based dynamic source routing algorithm for energy efficient multipath routing in MANET. In 2022 international conference on computer communication and informatics 2022 (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Alghamdi SA. Cuckoo energy-efficient load-balancing on-demand multipath routing protocol. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2022; 47(2):1321-35.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Suresh KR, Manimegalai P, Raj V, Dhanagopal R, Johnson SA. Cluster head selection and energy efficient multicast routing protocol-based optimal route selection for mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2022.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]