(Publisher of Peer Reviewed Open Access Journals)

International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration (IJATEE)

ISSN (Print):2394-5443    ISSN (Online):2394-7454
Volume-10 Issue-108 November-2023
Full-Text PDF
Paper Title : Closing the gap: exploring the untapped potential of machine learning in deaf students and hearing students’ academic performance
Author Name : Raji N R, R MathuSoothana S Kumar and Biji C. L
Abstract :

Assessments and critical feedback play a crucial role in helping students not only master a skill but also apply it effectively. Educational data mining (EDM) and machine learning (ML) tools are aiding educators in tailoring teaching strategies to individual student needs. While predictive analytics are widely used for hearing students, there is a notable gap in research on deaf students. Assessing deaf students necessitates the expertise of trained specialists, and their feedback is particularly critical in assisting these students in skill mastery. Various strategies have been developed to analyze the academic performance of deaf children, but there is a lack of integration of data to create a model categorizing different methods of early classification based on student academic performance. As part of a broader effort to address challenges faced by students struggling with speech perception and language development, there is an opportunity to conduct a systematic study of early academic interventions for deaf students. Failure to address these issues can result in an increased risk of delays in social-emotional development. The findings from our review highlight several key aspects, including (i) ML and EDM-based applications for student performance analysis, (ii) factors influencing academic performance among deaf students, (iii) potential EDM methods useful for assessing deaf children, (iv) the absence of benchmark data and the need for interpretability in existing methods, (v) the necessity for ML approaches in predicting the performance of deaf students, and (vi) the anticipated major assessment trend in the future through deep learning models. Our findings have implications for various stakeholders in education, including teachers, students, administrators, and researchers.

Keywords : Machine learning, Deaf education, Academic performance analysis, Educational data mining.
Cite this article : Raji NR, Kumar RM, C. BL. Closing the gap: exploring the untapped potential of machine learning in deaf students and hearing students’ academic performance. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 2023; 10(108):1449-1475. DOI:10.19101/IJATEE.2023.10101685.
References :
[1]Albreiki B, Zaki N, Alashwal H. A systematic literature review of student’ performance prediction using machine learning techniques. Education Sciences. 2021; 11(9):1-27.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[2]Newman L, Wagner M, Knokey AM, Marder C, Nagle K, Shaver D, et al. The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: a report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2011-3005. National Center for Special Education Research. 2011.
[Google Scholar]
[3]Schroedel JG, Geyer PD. Long-term career attainments of deaf and hard of hearing college graduates: Results from a 15-year follow-up survey. American Annals of the Deaf. 2000; 145(4):303-14.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[4]Bowe FG. Transition for deaf and hard-of-hearing students: a blueprint for change. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2003; 8(4):485-93.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[5]https://learninganalytics.upenn.edu/ryanbaker/Encyclopedia%20Chapter%20Draft%20v10%20-fw.pdf. Accessed 25 August 2023.
[6]Romero C, Ventura S. Educational data mining: a survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications. 2007; 33(1):135-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[7]Salas-pilco SZ, Yang Y. Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2022; 19(1):1-20.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[8]Khanna L, Singh SN, Alam M. Educational data mining and its role in determining factors affecting students academic performance: a systematic review. In 1st India international conference on information processing 2016 (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[9]Hasan R, Palaniappan S, Raziff AR, Mahmood S, Sarker KU. Student academic performance prediction by using decision tree algorithm. In 4th international conference on computer and information sciences 2018 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[10]Guarín CE, Guzmán EL, González FA. A model to predict low academic performance at a specific enrollment using data mining. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana De Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje. 2015; 10(3):119-25.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[11]Al-radaideh QA, Al ananbeh A, Al-shawakfa E. A classification model for predicting the suitable study track for school students. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences. 2011; 8(2):247-52.
[Google Scholar]
[12]Romero C, Ventura S. Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2013; 3(1):12-27.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[13]Martínez-rodríguez RA, Alvarez-xochihua O, Victoria OD, Arámburo AJ, Fraga JÁ. Use of machine learning to measure the influence of behavioral and personality factors on academic performance of higher education students. IEEE Latin America Transactions. 2019; 17(04):633-41.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[14]Durairaj M, Vijitha C. Educational data mining for prediction of student performance using clustering algorithms. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies. 2014; 5(4):5987-91.
[Google Scholar]
[15]Zollanvari A, Kizilirmak RC, Kho YH, Hernández-torrano D. Predicting students’ GPA and developing intervention strategies based on self-regulatory learning behaviors. IEEE Access. 2017; 5:23792-802.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[16]Patil AP, Ganesan K, Kanavalli A. Effective deep learning model to predict student grade point averages. In international conference on computational intelligence and computing research 2017 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[17]Zhang W, Zhou Y, Yi B. An interpretable online learners performance prediction model based on learning analytics. In proceedings of the 11th international conference on education technology and computers 2019 (pp. 148-54). ACM.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[18]Xu J, Moon KH, Van DSM. A machine learning approach for tracking and predicting student performance in degree programs. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. 2017; 11(5):742-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[19]Seelman KD. The world health organization/world bank’s first world report on disability. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2011; 3(2):11-4.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[20]Act C. Ministry of law and Justice (Legislative Department). The Gazette of India. 2013.
[Google Scholar]
[21]Ansari MS. Hearing screening program for school going children in India: necessity, justification, and suggested approaches. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology. 2021; 37:1-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[22]Mandke K, Chandekar P. Deaf education in India. Deaf Education Beyond the Western World: Context, Challenges, and Prospects. 2019.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[23]Qi S, Mitchell RE. Large-scale academic achievement testing of deaf and hard-of-hearing students: past, present, and future. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2012; 17(1):1-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[24]Knoors H, Marschark M. Language planning for the 21st century: revisiting bilingual language policy for deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2012; 17(3):291-305.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[25]Okoli C. A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2015; 37:879-910.
[Google Scholar]
[26]Roy S, Garg A. Analyzing performance of students by using data mining techniques a literature survey. In 4th international conference on electrical, computer and electronics 2017 (pp. 130-3). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[27]Bonde SN, Kirange DK. Survey on evaluation of students performance in educational data mining. In 2018 second international conference on inventive communication and computational technologies 2018 (pp. 209-13). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[28]Bakhshinategh B, Zaiane OR, Elatia S, Ipperciel D. Educational data mining applications and tasks: a survey of the last 10 years. Education and Information Technologies. 2018; 23:537-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[29]Hussain S, Khan MQ. Student-performulator: predicting students’ academic performance at secondary and intermediate level using machine learning. Annals of Data Science. 2023; 10(3):637-55.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[30]Pallathadka H, Wenda A, Ramirez-asís E, Asís-lópez M, Flores-albornoz J, Phasinam K. Classification and prediction of student performance data using various machine learning algorithms. Materials today: Proceedings. 2023; 80:3782-5.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[31]Alruwais N. Deep FM-based predictive model for student dropout in online classes. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 96954-70.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[32]Kusumawardani SS, Alfarozi SA. Transformer encoder model for sequential prediction of student performance based on their log activities. IEEE Access. 2023; 11:18960-71.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[33]Alhazmi E, Sheneamer A. Early predicting of students performance in higher education. IEEE Access. 2023; 11:27579-89.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[34]Pek RZ, Özyer ST, Elhage T, Özyer T, Alhajj R. The role of machine learning in identifying students at-risk and minimizing failure. IEEE Access. 2022; 11:1224-43.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[35]Liu D, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Li Q, Zhang C, Yin YU. Multiple features fusion attention mechanism enhanced deep knowledge tracing for student performance prediction. IEEE Access. 2020; 8:194894-903.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[36]Balogun To. Influence of parental involvement on academic performance of learners with hearing impairment in selected Schools in Kogi State, Nigeria. Ebonyi State College of Education, Ikwo Journal of Educational Research. 2023; 8(1):83-92.
[Google Scholar]
[37]Yağcı M. Educational data mining: prediction of students academic performance using machine learning algorithms. Smart Learning Environments. 2022; 9(1):1-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[38]Gligorea I, Yaseen MU, Cioca M, Gorski H, Oancea R. An interpretable framework for an efficient analysis of students’ academic performance. Sustainability. 2022; 14(14):1-21.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[39]Cohausz L. Towards real interpretability of student success prediction combining methods of XAI and social science. International educational data mining society. 2022 (pp. 1-7). ERIC.
[Google Scholar]
[40]Alwarthan S, Aslam N, Khan IU. An explainable model for identifying at-risk student at higher education. IEEE Access. 2022; 10:107649-68.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[41]Singh HP, Alhulail HN. Predicting student-teachers dropout risk and early identification: a four-step logistic regression approach. IEEE Access. 2022; 10:6470-82.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[42]Mingyu Z, Sutong W, Yanzhang W, Dujuan W. An interpretable prediction method for university student academic crisis warning. Complex & Intelligent Systems. 2022; 8(1):323-36.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[43]Tao X, Shannon-honson A, Delaney P, Li L, Dann C, Li Y, et al. Data analytics on online student engagement data for academic performance modeling. IEEE Access. 2022; 10:103176-86.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[44]Mumba D, Kasonde-ngandu S, Mandyata J. Perceptions of teachers and pupils on factors affecting academic performance of pupils with hearing impairment in primary schools in Zambia. European Journal of Special Education Research. 2022; 8(4).48-67.
[Google Scholar]
[45]Yousafzai BK, Khan SA, Rahman T, Khan I, Ullah I, Ur RA, et al. Student-performulator: student academic performance using hybrid deep neural network. Sustainability. 2021; 13(17):1-21.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[46]Prabowo H, Hidayat AA, Cenggoro TW, Rahutomo R, Purwandari K, Pardamean B. Aggregating time series and tabular data in deep learning model for university students’ GPA prediction. IEEE Access. 2021; 9:87370-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[47]Hussain S, Gaftandzhieva S, Maniruzzaman M, Doneva R, Muhsin ZF. Regression analysis of student academic performance using deep learning. Education and Information Technologies. 2021; 26:783-98.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[48]Sood S, Saini M. Hybridization of cluster-based LDA and ANN for student performance prediction and comments evaluation. Education and Information Technologies. 2021; 26:2863-78.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[49]Li S, Liu T. Performance prediction for higher education students using deep learning. Complexity. 2021; 2021:1-10.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[50]Alsraisri N. Predicting academic performance of deaf and hard of hearing students using predicting academic performance of deaf and hard of hearing students using educational data mining techniques, (Publication No.1442/8346) [Doctoral Dissertation King Saud Taibah University. 2021.
[Crossref]
[51]Zhao L, Chen K, Song J, Zhu X, Sun J, Caulfield B, et al. Academic performance prediction based on multisource, multifeature behavioral data. IEEE Access. 2020; 9:5453-65.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[52]Nabil A, Seyam M, Abou-elfetouh A. Prediction of students’ academic performance based on courses’ grades using deep neural networks. IEEE Access. 2021; 9:140731-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[53]Bujang SD, Selamat A, Ibrahim R, Krejcar O, Herrera-viedma E, Fujita H, et al. Multiclass prediction model for student grade prediction using machine learning. IEEE Access. 2021; 9:95608-21.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[54]Ma Y, Cui C, Nie X, Yang G, Shaheed K, Yin Y. Pre-course student performance prediction with multi-instance multi-label learning. Science China Information Sciences. 2019; 62:1-3.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[55]Mengash HA. Using data mining techniques to predict student performance to support decision making in university admission systems. IEEE Access. 2020; 8:55462-70.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[56]Berens J, Schneider K, Görtz S, Oster S, Burghoff J. Early detection of students at risk–predicting student dropouts using administrative student data and machine learning methods. CESifo working paper 2018 (pp. 1-37). Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[57]Adekitan AI, Noma-osaghae E. Data mining approach to predicting the performance of first year student in a university using the admission requirements. Education and Information Technologies. 2019; 24:1527-43.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[58]Ramanathan L, Parthasarathy G, Vijayakumar K, Lakshmanan L, Ramani S. Cluster-based distributed architecture for prediction of student’s performance in higher education. Cluster Computing. 2019; 22:1329-44.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[59]Hussain S, Dahan NA, Ba-alwib FM, Ribata N. Educational data mining and analysis of students’ academic performance using WEKA. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. 2018; 9(2):447-59.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[60]Baneres D, Rodríguez-gonzalez ME, Serra M. An early feedback prediction system for learners at-risk within a first-year higher education course. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2019; 12(2):249-63.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[61]Al-Shabandar R, Hussain AJ, Liatsis P, Keight R. Detecting at-risk students with early interventions using machine learning techniques. IEEE Access. 2019; 7:149464-78.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[62]Haridas M, Gutjahr G, Raman R, Ramaraju R, Nedungadi P. Predicting school performance and early risk of failure from an intelligent tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies. 2020; 25:3995-4013.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[63]Adnan M, Habib A, Ashraf J, Mussadiq S, Raza AA, Abid M, et al. Predicting at-risk students at different percentages of course length for early intervention using machine learning models. IEEE Access. 2021; 9:7519-39.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[64]Hung JL, Shelton BE, Yang J, Du X. Improving predictive modeling for at-risk student identification: a multistage approach. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2019; 12(2):148-57.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[65]Qin K, Xie X, He Q, Deng G. Early warning of student performance with integration of subjective and objective elements. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 72601-17.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[66]Kemper L, Vorhoff G, Wigger BU. Predicting student dropout: a machine learning approach. European Journal of Higher Education. 2020; 10(1):28-47.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[67]Durga VS, Jeyaprakash T. Predicting academic performance of deaf students using feed forward neural network and an improved PSO Algorithm. Webology. 2021; 18(SI01):112-26.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[68]Zaffar M, Hashmani MA, Savita KS, Rizvi SS. A study of feature selection algorithms for predicting students academic performance. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 2018; 9(5):541-9.
[Google Scholar]
[69]Alshanqiti A, Namoun A. Predicting student performance and its influential factors using hybrid regression and multi-label classification. IEEE Access. 2020; 8:203827-44.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[70]Ko CY, Leu FY. Examining successful attributes for undergraduate students by applying machine learning techniques. IEEE Transactions on Education. 2020; 64(1):50-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[71]Sarwat S, Ullah N, Sadiq S, Saleem R, Umer M, Eshmawi AA, et al. Predicting students’ academic performance with conditional generative adversarial network and deep SVM. Sensors. 2022; 22(13):1-18.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[72]Lu H, Yuan J. Student performance prediction model based on discriminative feature selection. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online). 2018; 13(10):55.
[Google Scholar]
[73]Khan A, Ghosh SK. Data mining based analysis to explore the effect of teaching on student performance. Education and Information Technologies. 2018; 23:1677-97.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[74]Marwaha A, Singla A. A study of factors to predict at-risk students based on machine learning techniques. In proceedings of intelligent communication, control and devices 2018 (pp. 133-41). Springer Singapore.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[75]Al-Obeidat F, Tubaishat A, Dillon A, Shah B. Analyzing students’ performance using multi-criteria classification. Cluster Computing. 2018; 21:623-32.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[76]Adesokan A, Giwa BP. Perceived factors influencing the academic performance of students with hearing impairment in inclusive settings. International Journal of Academic Management Science Research. 2022; 6(9): 326-33.
[Google Scholar]
[77]Kaindu E, Simuyaba E, Muleya G, Simui F. Exploration of academic performance of learners with hearing impairment at Munali secondary school, Zambia (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Zambia). International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation. 2021:57-66.
[Google Scholar]
[78]Su JY, Guthridge S, He VY, Howard D, Leach AJ. The impact of hearing impairment on early academic achievement in Aboriginal children living in remote Australia: a data linkage study. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20:1-3.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[79]Khan I, Ahmad AR, Jabeur N, Mahdi MN. A conceptual framework to aid attribute selection in machine learning student performance prediction models. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2021; 15(15):1-16.
[Google Scholar]
[80]Kumar M, Mehta G, Nayar N, Sharma A. EMT: ensemble meta-based tree model for predicting student performance in academics. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering 2021 (p. 012062). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[81]Kumar M, Mehta G, Nayar N, Sharma A. EMT: ensemble meta-based tree model for predicting student performance in academics. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering 2021 (pp. 1-10). IOP Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[82]El AO, El AEMY, Oughdir L, Dakkak A, El AY. A multiple linear regression-based approach to predict student performance. In international conference on advanced intelligent systems for sustainable development 2019 (pp. 9-23). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[83]Naicker N, Adeliyi T, Wing J. Linear support vector machines for prediction of student performance in school-based education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2020; 2020:1-7.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[84]Yan L, Liu Y. An ensemble prediction model for potential student recommendation using machine learning. Symmetry. 2020; 12(5):1-17.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[85]Hamoud A, Hashim AS, Awadh WA. Predicting student performance in higher education institutions using decision tree analysis. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence. 2018; 5:26-31.
[Google Scholar]
[86]Ezz M, Elshenawy A. Adaptive recommendation system using machine learning algorithms for predicting student’s best academic program. Education and Information Technologies. 2020; 25:2733-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[87]Fernández-garcía AJ, Rodríguez-echeverría R, Preciado JC, Manzano JM, Sánchez-figueroa F. Creating a recommender system to support higher education students in the subject enrollment decision. IEEE Access. 2020; 8:189069-88.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[88]Menon HK, Janardhan V. Machine learning approaches in education. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021; 43:3470-80.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[89]Conijn R, Snijders C, Kleingeld A, Matzat U. Predicting student performance from LMS data: a comparison of 17 blended courses using Moodle LMS. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2016; 10(1):17-29.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[90]Al-sudani S, Palaniappan R. Predicting students’ final degree classification using an extended profile. Education and Information Technologies. 2019; 24:2357-69.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[91]Altabrawee H, Ali OA, Ajmi SQ. Predicting students’ performance using machine learning techniques. Journal of University of Babylon for Pure and Applied Sciences. 2019; 27(1):194-205.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[92]Zohair A, Mahmoud L. Prediction of Student’s performance by modelling small dataset size. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019; 16(1):1-8.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[93]Mizintseva MF. Smart technologies for smart life. In smart technologies for society, state and economy 2021 (pp. 653-64). Springer International Publishing.
[Google Scholar]
[94]Yekun EA, Haile AT. Student performance prediction with optimum multilabel ensemble model. Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2021; 30(1):511-23.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[95]Chen F, Cui Y. Utilizing student time series behaviour in learning management systems for early prediction of course performance. Journal of Learning Analytics. 2020; 7(2):1-7.
[Google Scholar]
[96]Ahmad F, Ismail NH, Aziz AA. The prediction of students’ academic performance using classification data mining techniques. Applied Mathematical Sciences. 2015; 9(129):6415-26.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[97]Nieto Y, Gacía-díaz V, Montenegro C, González CC, Crespo RG. Usage of machine learning for strategic decision making at higher educational institutions. IEEE Access. 2019; 7:75007-17.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[98]Qazdar A, Er-raha B, Cherkaoui C, Mammass D. A machine learning algorithm framework for predicting students performance: a case study of baccalaureate students in Morocco. Education and Information Technologies. 2019; 24:3577-89.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[99]Chung JY, Lee S. Dropout early warning systems for high school students using machine learning. Children and Youth Services Review. 2019; 96:346-53.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[100]Li X, Zhang Y, Cheng H, Li M, Yin B. Student achievement prediction using deep neural network from multi-source campus data. Complex & Intelligent Systems. 2022; 8(6):5143-56.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[101]Ha DT, Loan PT, Giap CN, Huong NT. An empirical study for student academic performance prediction using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security. 2020; 18(3):75-82.
[Google Scholar]
[102]Soni A, Kumar V, Kaur R, Hemavathi D. Predicting student performance using data mining techniques. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2018; 119(12):221-7.
[Google Scholar]
[103]Luangrungruang T, Kokaew U. E-learning model to identify the learning styles of hearing-impaired students. Sustainability. 2022; 14(20):1-19.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[104]Luangrungruang T, Kokaew U. Adapting fleming-type learning style classifications to deaf student behavior. Sustainability. 2022; 14(8):1-16.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[105]Krishnamoorthy D, Lokesh DU. Process of building a dataset and classification of vark learning styles with machine learning and predictive analytics models. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government. 2020; 26(2):903-10.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[106]Ikawati Y, Al RMU, Winarno I. Student behavior analysis to predict learning styles based felder silverman model using ensemble tree method. EMITTER International Journal of Engineering Technology. 2021; 9(1):92-106.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[107]Ranjeeth S, Latchoumi TP, Paul PV. Optimal stochastic gradient descent with multilayer perceptron based students academic performance prediction model. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications (Formerly: Recent Patents on Computer Science). 2021; 14(6):1728-41.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[108]Yadav RS. Application of hybrid clustering methods for student performance evaluation. International Journal of Information Technology. 2020; 12(3):749-56.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[109]Wafi M, Faruq U, Supianto AA. Automatic feature selection for modified k-nearest neighbor to predict students academic performance. In international conference on sustainable information engineering and technology 2019 (pp. 44-8). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[110]Afzaal M, Nouri J, Zia A, Papapetrou P, Fors U, Wu Y, et al. Explainable AI for data-driven feedback and intelligent action recommendations to support students self-regulation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. 2021; 4:1-20.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[111]Hussain S, Atallah R, Kamsin A, Hazarika J. Classification, clustering and association rule mining in educational datasets using data mining tools: a case study. In cybernetics and algorithms in intelligent systems: proceedings of 7th computer science on-line conference 2018 (pp. 196-211). Springer International Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[112]Villagrá-arnedo CJ, Gallego-durán FJ, Llorens-largo F, Compañ-rosique P, Satorre-cuerda R, Molina-carmona R. Improving the expressiveness of black-box models for predicting student performance. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017; 72:621-31.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[113]Uliyan D, Aljaloud AS, Alkhalil A, Al AHS, Mohamed MA, Alogali AF. Deep learning model to predict students retention using BLSTM and CRF. IEEE Access. 2021; 9:135550-8.
[Google Scholar]
[114]Thammasiri D, Delen D, Meesad P, Kasap N. A critical assessment of imbalanced class distribution problem: the case of predicting freshmen student attrition. Expert Systems with Applications. 2014; 41(2):321-30.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[115]Buenaño-fernández D, Gil D, Luján-mora S. Application of machine learning in predicting performance for computer engineering students: a case study. Sustainability. 2019; 11(10):1-18.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[116]Abidoye F, Abidoye AO. Hypotheses testing of variables of basic science teachers’on performace of students’in upper basic schools in Kwara State, Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research Review. 2023; 8(2):368-72.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[117]Agyire-tettey EE, Cobbina M, Hamenoo ES. Academic challenges of students with hearing impairment (SHIs) in Ghana. Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development. 2017; 28(3):127-50.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[118]Smith DH, Andrews JF. Deaf and hard of hearing faculty in higher education: enhancing access, equity, policy, and practice. Disability & Society. 2015; 30(10):1521-36.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[119]Hrastinski I, Wilbur RB. Academic achievement of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in an ASL/English bilingual program. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2016; 21(2):156-70.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[120]Ekeh PU, Oladayo OT. Academic achievement of regular and special needs students in inclusive and non-inclusive classroom settings. European Scientific Journal. 2013; 9(8):141-50.
[Google Scholar]
[121]Marschark M, Shaver DM, Nagle KM, Newman LA. Predicting the academic achievement of deaf and hard-of-hearing students from individual, household, communication, and educational factors. Exceptional Children. 2015; 81(3):350-69.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[122]Qu S, Li K, Zhang S, Wang Y. Predicting achievement of students in smart campus. IEEE Access. 2018; 6:60264-73.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[123]Yu CC, Wu Y. Early warning system for online stem learning—a slimmer approach using recurrent neural networks. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22):1-17.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[124]Olive DM, Huynh DQ, Reynolds M, Dougiamas M, Wiese D. A quest for a one-size-fits-all neural network: early prediction of students at risk in online courses. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2019; 12(2):171-83.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[125]Helal S, Li J, Liu L, Ebrahimie E, Dawson S, Murray DJ, et al. Predicting academic performance by considering student heterogeneity. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2018; 161:134-46.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[126]Al-masri A, Curran K. Smart technologies and innovation for a sustainable future. In advances in science, technology & innovation, proceedings of the 1st American university in the Emirates international research conference, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 2017 (pp. 15-6). Springer.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[127]Kim BH, Vizitei E, Ganapathi V. GritNet: student performance prediction with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07405. 2018.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[128]Stassen ML, Doherty K, Poe M. Program-based review and assessment. US: University of Massachusetts. 2001.
[Google Scholar]
[129]NR R, Balan RVS, CL B. A novel concept of analysing performance of deaf students using neural networks. In international conference on communication, control and information sciences 2021 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[130]Patiño-toro ON, Valencia-arias A, Fernández-toro A, Jiménez-guzmán A, Gil CA. Proposed methodology for designing and developing MOOCs for the deaf community. Heliyon. 2023; 9(10):1-14.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[131]Borges I. Deaf students learning mathematics: interactive patterns, participation, and inclusion. Inside the Mathematics Class: Sociological Perspectives on Participation, Inclusion, and Enhancement. 2018:209-28.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[132]Lissi MR, Iturriaga C, Sebastián C, Vergara M, Henríquez C, Hofmann S. Deaf and hard of hearing students’ opportunities for learning in a regular secondary school in Chile: teacher practices and beliefs. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. 2017; 29(1):55-75.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[133]Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C. Why should i trust you? explaining the predictions of any classifier. In proceedings of the 22nd SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining 2016 (pp. 1135-44). ACM.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[134]Adadi A, Berrada M. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access. 2018; 6:52138-60.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[135]Al BB, Zaki N, Mohamed EA. Using educational data mining techniques to predict student performance. In international conference on electrical and computing technologies and applications 2019 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[136]Arrieta AB, Díaz-rodríguez N, Del SJ, Bennetot A, Tabik S, Barbado A, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information fusion. 2020; 58:82-115.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[137]Alamri R, Alharbi B. Explainable student performance prediction models: a systematic review. IEEE Access. 2021; 9:33132-43.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[138]Chitti M, Chitti P, Jayabalan M. Need for interpretable student performance prediction. In 13th international conference on developments in esystems engineering 2020 (pp. 269-72). IEEE.
[Google Scholar]
[139]Data EO. Performance evaluation for four types of machine learning algorithms using. Smart Education and e-Learning; 2019.
[Google Scholar]
[140]Sahlaoui H, Nayyar A, Agoujil S, Jaber MM. Predicting and interpreting student performance using ensemble models and shapley additive explanations. IEEE Access. 2021; 9:152688-703.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[141]Conati C, Barral O, Putnam V, Rieger L. Toward personalized XAI: a case study in intelligent tutoring systems. Artificial intelligence. 2021; 298:103503.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[142]Sargsyan A, Karapetyan A, Woon WL, Alshamsi A. Explainable AI as a social microscope: a case study on academic performance. In machine learning, optimization, and data science: 6th international conference, LOD 2020, Siena, Italy, Part I 2020 (pp. 257-68). Springer International Publishing.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[143]Sharma A, Singh PK, Chandra R. SMOTified-GAN for class imbalanced pattern classification problems. IEEE Access. 2022; 10:30655-65.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
[144]Zavala Perez M. How does Americas next top model represent deafness? Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research. 2016; 4(1):40-53.
[Google Scholar]