Paper Title:
Robustness of triple I algorithms based on Schweizer-Sklar operators in fuzzy reasoning
Author Name:
Minxia Luo and Yaping Wang
Abstract:
In this paper, the perturbation of fuzzy connectives and the robustness of fuzzy reasoning are investigated. This perturbation of Schweizer-Sklar parameterized t-norms and its residuated implication operators are given. We show that full implication triple I algorithms based on Schweizer-sklar operators are robust for normalized Minkowski distance.
Keywords:
Schweizer-Sklar operators, Triple I algorithms, Fuzzy reasoning, Robustness.
Cite this article:
Minxia Luo and Yaping Wang .Robustness of triple I algorithms based on Schweizer-Sklar operators in fuzzy reasoning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research. 2016;6(22):1-8. DOI: 10.19101/IJACR.2016.622009
References:
[1]Cai KY. Robustness of fuzzy reasoning and δ-equalities of fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2001;9(5):738-50.
[2]Dai S, Pei D, Wang SM. Perturbation of fuzzy sets and fuzzy reasoning based on normalized Minkowski distances. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2012;189(1):63-73.
[3]Dai S, Pei D, Guo D. Robustness analysis of full implication inference method. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2013;54(5):653-66.
[4]Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Pólya G. Inequalities. Cambridge University Press;1952.
[5]He H,Wang H, Liu Y, Wang Y, Du Y. Principle of universal logics. Science Press, Beijing; 2001.
[6]Hung WL, Yang MS. Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Lp metric. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2007;46(1):120-36.
[7]Klement EP, Mesiar R, Pap E. Triangular norms. Position paper II: general constructions and parameterized families. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2004;145(3):411-38.
[8]Luo M, Yao N. Triple I algorithms based on Schweizer–Sklar operators in fuzzy reasoning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2013;54(5):640-52.
[9]Li Y, Qin K, He X. Robustness of fuzzy connectives and fuzzy reasoning. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2013;225:93-105.
[10]Pei D. Unified full implication algorithms of fuzzy reasoning. Information Sciences. 2008;178(2):520-30.
[11]Pei D. Formalization of implication based fuzzy reasoning method. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2012;53(5):837-46.
[12]Wang GJ. The full implication triple I method of fuzzy reasoning. Science in China (Series E).1999;29(1):43-53. (in Chinese).
[13]Wang GJ. On the logic foundation of fuzzy reasoning. Information Sciences. 1999;117(1):47-88.
[14]Whalen T. Parameterized R-implications. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2003;134(2):231-81.
[15]Wang GJ, Fu L. Unified forms of triple I method. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 2005;49(5):923-32.
[16]Wang GJ. Non-classical mathematical logic and approximate reasoning. Science Press, Beijing;2008. (in Chinese).
[17]Xu WH, Xie ZK, Yang JY, Ye YP. Continuity and approximation properties of two classes of algorithms for fuzzy inference. Journal of Software. 2004;15(10):1485-92. (in Chinese).
[18]Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965;8(3):338-53.
[19]Zadeh LA. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information Sciences. 1975;8(3):199-249.
[20]Zadeh LA. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—II. Information Sciences. 1975;8(4):301-57.
[21]Zadeh LA. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III. Information Sciences. 1975;9(1):43-80.
[22]Zadeh LA. Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU)–an outline. Information Sciences. 2005;172(1):1-40.